2019
DOI: 10.1002/cncr.32595
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Biomarkers in ovarian cancer: To be or not to be

Abstract: Biomarkers are becoming increasingly important in the treatment of epithelial ovarian cancer. Recent work from many laboratories has begun to provide clinically meaningful biomarkers. This review summarizes the state of the science regarding biomarkers for stratifying early-stage patients into those who benefit from adjuvant treatment, primary debulking versus interval debulking, and specific targeted therapy. In addition, new molecular imaging technologies have been developed to allow the surgeon to resect su… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
37
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
37
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Ovarian cancer (OC), the third common gynecologic malignancy, contributes to the most cancer-caused mortality in women and increases with approximately 22,000 new cases and 14,180 deaths every year in the United States [1,2]. In histological subtypes, approximately 90% of OC is epithelial ovarian cancer, which consists of serous, endometrioid, and clear-cell ovarian carcinoma [2][3][4]. In the examination, the early-stage OC, such as the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage-I/II, is difficult to diagnose because most symptoms of OC are nonspecific.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Ovarian cancer (OC), the third common gynecologic malignancy, contributes to the most cancer-caused mortality in women and increases with approximately 22,000 new cases and 14,180 deaths every year in the United States [1,2]. In histological subtypes, approximately 90% of OC is epithelial ovarian cancer, which consists of serous, endometrioid, and clear-cell ovarian carcinoma [2][3][4]. In the examination, the early-stage OC, such as the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage-I/II, is difficult to diagnose because most symptoms of OC are nonspecific.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to the lack of early detection or screening test, about 70% of patients with OC are diagnosed at an advanced stage (FIGO stage III/IV), a mere 30% of which are expected to survive 5 years [1,6,7]. In contrast, the 5-year overall survival of patients with early-stage OC was reported to be 70-95% [3,4]. Therefore, it is definitely beneficial to reducing OC-caused mortality to develop more effective diagnostic methods for this disease.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most EOC patients (70%) are diagnosed in an advanced stage, i.e., International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage IIb -IV. The prognosis of advanced stage EOC is poor, with a 5-year survival rate of 20-30% [1][2][3].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is a need of more tools and assays to predict the clinical response to chemotherapy in EOC patients [3]. Ideally, this would avoid suboptimal treatment and prevent delay of optimal treatment, and thus clinical deterioration, unnecessary side effects of inadequate chemotherapeutics, and high societal costs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unfortunately, most patients are diagnosed with a late stage disease and the five-year survival for these patients has remained static at around 30% [2]. The standard of care for the majority of HGSOC patients is primary cytoreductive (debulking) surgery, followed by adjuvant platinum and paclitaxel chemotherapy [3]. Progress in the treatment of ovarian cancer has seen the introduction of targeted therapies, such as bevacizumab and ploy(adenosine diphosphate-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors, and a plethora of immunotherapy trials [4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%