2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.fsigss.2009.09.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Biological and DNA evidence in 1000 sexual assault cases

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
15
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
1
15
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The time elapsed between the assault and the examination will have an impact on the amount of suspect DNA available for collection. Though the victim may not immediately come to the hospital for an exam, it is still worthwhile to collect intimate evidence samples because studies have shown that semen can last in the body for 72 hours or more post coitus (Gingras et al, 2009; Hall & Ballantyne, 2003). However, the probability of obtaining a partial profile or no profile increases the longer a victim waits to be examined.…”
Section: Dna Considerations During Examinationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The time elapsed between the assault and the examination will have an impact on the amount of suspect DNA available for collection. Though the victim may not immediately come to the hospital for an exam, it is still worthwhile to collect intimate evidence samples because studies have shown that semen can last in the body for 72 hours or more post coitus (Gingras et al, 2009; Hall & Ballantyne, 2003). However, the probability of obtaining a partial profile or no profile increases the longer a victim waits to be examined.…”
Section: Dna Considerations During Examinationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In many cases, the violence is carried out with a partner or in a group, in which case, biological samples from multiple individuals may be found mixed on the victim's body or in some body orifice of the victim, or the victim's self-defense may have been directed at multiple persons. Whatever the case, even in the case of a single attacker, it is unlikely for samples obtainable from the body surface to be of homogeneous origin, while in the case of samples from body orifices, it is almost unavoidable that the biological samples connected to the potential perpetrator be mixed [20]. The careful collection of samples contributes greatly toward increasing the chance for conclusivity of subsequent laboratory tests and/or expert proceedings [21].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is well known that because of the nature of the crime, sexual assault tends to leave traces that allow the identification of the perpetrator in about 50% of cases [2], and due to the possibility of additional offenses by the criminal, it is recommended to insert the genetic profiles generated in DNA banks [3]. In parallel, there are situations where the only materials available for analysis are traces, such as semen stains on the victim's clothing.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%