2010
DOI: 10.1002/adfm.201001031
|Get access via publisher |Summarize |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts

Biocompatible and Biodegradable Materials for Organic Field‐Effect Transistors

Abstract: Biocompatible‐ingestible electronic circuits and capsules for medical diagnosis and monitoring are currently based on traditional silicon technology. Organic electronics has huge potential for developing biodegradable, biocompatible, bioresorbable, or even metabolizable products. An ideal pathway for such electronic devices involves fabrication with materials from nature, or materials found in common commodity products. Transistors with an operational voltage as low as 4–5 V, a source drain current of up to 0.… Show more

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
356
104
8
5

Citation Types

4
425
1
2

Year Published

2010
2010
2026
2026

Publication Types

Select...
396
29
22
2

Relationship

23
426

Authors

Journals

citations

Cited by 446 publications

(432 citation statements)
references

References 33 publications

4
425
1
2
Order By: Relevance
How this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…It is interesting to see the strikingly similar appearance of the three vat orange dyes in aggregated (powder form), with comparable shades of orange, as shown by the photograph of the evaporation crucibles, but the rather different appearance in the thin evaporated film of vat orange 3, compared to the other two investigated counterparts. As a matter of fact, vat orange 9 appears in the thin film remarkably analogous in color with vat yellow 1, reported previously by our group, 80,81 a molecule that has two nitrogen atoms at its two core phenyl groups.…”
Section: Results
supporting
confidence: 80%
“…Obviously, the result obtained here, ∼6 × 10 −4 cm 2 Vs −1 is not far off the value obtained previously for vat orange 3, i.e. ∼2 × 10 −3 cm 2 Vs −1 81 and demonstrates that the fabrication route for this organic semiconductor is quite reproducible on different dielectric substrates.…”
Section: Results
contrasting
confidence: 50%
See 1 more Smart Citation
How this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…It is interesting to see the strikingly similar appearance of the three vat orange dyes in aggregated (powder form), with comparable shades of orange, as shown by the photograph of the evaporation crucibles, but the rather different appearance in the thin evaporated film of vat orange 3, compared to the other two investigated counterparts. As a matter of fact, vat orange 9 appears in the thin film remarkably analogous in color with vat yellow 1, reported previously by our group, 80,81 a molecule that has two nitrogen atoms at its two core phenyl groups.…”
Section: Results
supporting
confidence: 80%
“…Obviously, the result obtained here, ∼6 × 10 −4 cm 2 Vs −1 is not far off the value obtained previously for vat orange 3, i.e. ∼2 × 10 −3 cm 2 Vs −1 81 and demonstrates that the fabrication route for this organic semiconductor is quite reproducible on different dielectric substrates.…”
Section: Results
contrasting
confidence: 50%
How this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…The rate remains constant (R i ) up to a critical dopant concentration (C 0 ). Above C 0 , a sharp decrease occurs, which is inversely proportional to the fourth power of the dopant concentration (C) consistent with a functional form established from studies of silicon under conditions of high pH 27 4 (1)…”
Section: Results
supporting
confidence: 77%
How this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…In contrast, p(CP-hexyl) performed poorly, with mobilities on the order of 10 −8 cm 2 V −1 s −1 , regardless of the presence of dopants. The performance of p(CP-hexyl) is on par with the electronic performance of β-carotene reported in similar device architectures, 62,63 which further demonstrates the detrimental effect of the imine bond on electronic performance despite the increase of conjugation length in the polymeric state. We note that the transfer and output curves for p(CP-hexyl) and some of the output curves for caro-PPV are non-standard and we attribute this to poor semiconductor performance, as seen with β-carotene.…”
Section: Results
supporting
confidence: 53%
“…In contrast, p(CP-hexyl) performed poorly, with mobilities on the order of 10 −8 cm 2 V −1 s −1 , regardless of the presence of dopants. The performance of p(CP-hexyl) is on par with the electronic performance of β-carotene reported in similar device architectures, 62,63 which further demonstrates…”
Section: Organic Field-effect Transistors
supporting
confidence: 60%