2019
DOI: 10.1155/2019/2492315
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Biochemical and Biological Profile of Parotoid Secretion of the AmazonianRhinella marina(Anura: Bufonidae)

Abstract: Skin secretions of frogs have a high chemical complexity. They have diverse types of biomolecules, such as proteins, peptides, biogenic amines, and alkaloids. These compounds protect amphibians’ skin against growth of bacteria, fungi, and protozoa and participate in defense system against attack from predators. Therewith, this work performed biochemical and biological profile of macroglands parotoid secretion from cane toad. For poison analysis, we performed molecular exclusion and reverse phase chromatography… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
(53 reference statements)
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The IC 50 for Rhinella marina methanolic crude extract is around 0.05 µg/mL in both sensitive and resistant cell lines (excepted for MM074-R IC 50 = 11.50 µg/mL). Previous studies had already reported the antiproliferative activity of Rhinella marina crude extracts on different cancer types (gastric, bladder, lung, liver, colorectal and breast cancers), but with IC 50 values 1.5 to 800 times higher than the ones we obtained on melanoma cells [27,36]. Its antiproliferative properties on chemo-resistant cancer cells has also been highlighted on leukemia cells harboring multidrug resistance with an IC 50 = 0.18 µg/mL [26].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 44%
“…The IC 50 for Rhinella marina methanolic crude extract is around 0.05 µg/mL in both sensitive and resistant cell lines (excepted for MM074-R IC 50 = 11.50 µg/mL). Previous studies had already reported the antiproliferative activity of Rhinella marina crude extracts on different cancer types (gastric, bladder, lung, liver, colorectal and breast cancers), but with IC 50 values 1.5 to 800 times higher than the ones we obtained on melanoma cells [27,36]. Its antiproliferative properties on chemo-resistant cancer cells has also been highlighted on leukemia cells harboring multidrug resistance with an IC 50 = 0.18 µg/mL [26].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 44%
“…The composition and biological effects of the PGS of the Amazonian R. marina has been extensively studied [8,18,26], while that of R. horribilis remained unknown. In this study, some 55 constituents, including argininyl diacids, bufadienolides argininyl diacids, bufadienolides, and alkaloids were identified/tentatively identified in the PGS of R. horribilis for the first time.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An interestingly mechanistic explanation of these effects may be proposed, taking into consideration the effects of current MTA on cancer cells mentioned above [16]. Although certain bufadienolides present in the poison secretion of toads produce cell cycle arrest in S-phase [48], reduce the activity and protein levels of topoisomerases [49,50] and intercalates with DNA [51]; other DNA damage-independent mechanisms have also been recently described [8,26]. For example, the major constituents of the PGS of Rhinella species such as bufalin, marinobufagin, telocinobufagin, and hellebrigenin exhibit strong binding affinities to tubulin in vitro and in vivo conditions, producing dysregulated microtubule arrangement and G2/M cell cycle arrest in cancer cells [8].…”
Section: Effect Of Fractions B and C Of The R Horribilis Pgs On The mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Several toad species in the family Bufonidae are known to synthesize bufadienolides de novo in the serous glands of their skin already from early larval stages on (Hayes et al 2009a;Ujszegi et al 2017;Üveges et al 2017). These skin-toxins may be effective against natural enemies including predators (Denton and Beebee 1991;Hantak et al 2016;Kruse and Stone 1984;Peterson and Blaustein 1991;Shine 2010), competitors (Bókony et al 2018) and potential pathogens (Barnhart et al 2017;Cunha Filho et al 2005;De Medeiros et al 2019;Tempone et al 2008). However, little is known about what evolutionary processes and environmental factors influence bufadienolide synthesis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%