2016
DOI: 10.5130/ajceb.v16i3.5159
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

BIM adoption within Australian Small and Medium-sized Enterprises (SMEs): an innovation diffusion model

Abstract: Despite the envisaged benefits of BIM adoption for SMEs, BIM in SMEs has remained an underrepresented area within the available academic literature. This study proposes and draws upon a framework grounded on innovation diffusion theory (IDT) to provide an illuminating insight into the current state of BIM and the main barriers to BIM adoption within Australian SMEs. Based on analyses of 135 questionnaires completed by SMEs through partial least squares structural equation modelling (PLS-SEM) and grounded on th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

11
205
2
4

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 159 publications
(222 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
(67 reference statements)
11
205
2
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Consequently, various roles across the construction supply chain show different levels of interest towards BIM (ACIF and APCC 2017;. Eadie et al (2013) proffered that company size is an important determinant of BIM use while Jaradat and Sexton (2016) and Hosseini et al (2016) claimed that construction management research conducted has favored BIM adoption in large practices and megaprojects -such work has inadvertently created the impression that BIM is for large organizations. In support of this largely unsubstantiated conjecture, Dainty et al (2017) Dainty et al (2017) implies that a cavernous 'digital divide' has transpired between SMEs, large firms and their respective BIM adoption level -caused by insufficient resources, finance and/ or knowledge or skills inherent within the workforce (Eadie et al 2013).…”
Section: Rolementioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Consequently, various roles across the construction supply chain show different levels of interest towards BIM (ACIF and APCC 2017;. Eadie et al (2013) proffered that company size is an important determinant of BIM use while Jaradat and Sexton (2016) and Hosseini et al (2016) claimed that construction management research conducted has favored BIM adoption in large practices and megaprojects -such work has inadvertently created the impression that BIM is for large organizations. In support of this largely unsubstantiated conjecture, Dainty et al (2017) Dainty et al (2017) implies that a cavernous 'digital divide' has transpired between SMEs, large firms and their respective BIM adoption level -caused by insufficient resources, finance and/ or knowledge or skills inherent within the workforce (Eadie et al 2013).…”
Section: Rolementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, embedding widespread and mature use of BIM is essential to an industry that is heavily reliant upon engaging SMEs (Hosseini et al 2016;Lam et al 2017). As asserted by Shelton et al (2016):…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations