2011
DOI: 10.1136/jnnp.2010.222992
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bilateral caudal zona incerta nucleus stimulation for essential tremor: outcome and quality of life

Abstract: Bilateral cZI stimulation is safe and effective in suppressing the postural and action component of ET. It is associated with a low incidence of stimulation related complications and patients do not develop tolerance to stimulation with maintained clinical benefit over a follow-up period of up to 7 years.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
71
0
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 84 publications
(75 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
3
71
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The clinical outcome is not the focus of this paper, but it is worth noting that the clinical ETRS scores (table 1) are consistent with previous reports of cZi DBS for ET [6,7,9] and compare well with the published experience of VIM DBS [2,6,19,20]. …”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 76%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The clinical outcome is not the focus of this paper, but it is worth noting that the clinical ETRS scores (table 1) are consistent with previous reports of cZi DBS for ET [6,7,9] and compare well with the published experience of VIM DBS [2,6,19,20]. …”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 76%
“…The posterior subthalamic area (PSA) is situated immediately inferior to the VIM and posteromedial to the subthalamic nucleus (STN). Cerebellothalamic axons are particularly dense within the PSA before dispersing into the VIM, and promising results have been reported regarding DBS in this area [5,6,7,8,9]. One plausible explanation for the effectiveness of PSA DBS is that stimulation of axons instead of nuclei actually affects more neurons and therefore also alters tremor oscillations more efficiently [3,4,10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A recent study by Burrows et al [23] comparing DBS of the STN and the ZI provided similar findings resulting in sustained motor benefit with less limbic side effects, including anxiety and self-reported depression, for ZI stimulation. Furthermore, the stimulation of the cZI [18,24,25] seems to be superior compared to the stimulation of the STN in improving contralateral parkinsonism [26] . Moreover, a prospective study suggested that bilateral stimulation of the cZI nucleus is effective in suppressing tremors of various etiologies of both the distal and proximal extremities [25] .…”
Section: Deep Brain Stimulation (Dbs)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, the stimulation of the cZI [18,24,25] seems to be superior compared to the stimulation of the STN in improving contralateral parkinsonism [26] . Moreover, a prospective study suggested that bilateral stimulation of the cZI nucleus is effective in suppressing tremors of various etiologies of both the distal and proximal extremities [25] . Previous studies including magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) studies up to 1.5 T showed that the visualization of the ZI is unsatisfactory as the small nucleus is hard to distinguish from the surrounding vital structures in the subthalamic region [27,28] .…”
Section: Deep Brain Stimulation (Dbs)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ventral intermediate nucleus of the thalamus is the most widely agreed target for treating ET with DBS [15,16], with an average tremor control of over 80% in these patients [17,18,19]. Other investigators have suggested that the subthalamic region, posterior subthalamic area and caudal zona incerta nucleus may also be an effective target for ET [20,21,22]. The technique is, however, limited in some ET patients by relevant side effects such as dysarthria, disequilibrium and paresthesia.…”
Section: Clinical Applications Of Deep Brain Stimulationmentioning
confidence: 99%