2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.gene.2015.04.058
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bichir microRNA repertoire suggests a ray-finned fish affinity of Polypteriforme

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The miRNA showed higher level of conservation than protein-coding sequence, which had been confirmed by previous studies [ 20 , 31 , 40 , 42 ]. There are two important implications in this study.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…The miRNA showed higher level of conservation than protein-coding sequence, which had been confirmed by previous studies [ 20 , 31 , 40 , 42 ]. There are two important implications in this study.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…Any miRNA that met the sequence homology criteria of Yang et al [35] and Jain et al [36] was considered a conserved miRNA gene. Through this analysis, we identified a total of 151 conserved miRNAs which belonging to 47 miRNA families in both camellia species (Additional file 1: Table S6).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All mature sequences, star sequences and precursor sequences cored by miRDeep2 were retained and regarded as putative miRNAs and used for further analysis to identify known and novel miRNAs [33, 34]. Known miRNAs were annotated by identifying their homologous imRNAs in miRBase database (http://www.mirbase.org/) using the following criteria: 1) seed region, nucleotides 2–7 must be identical; and 2) the remainder of the sequence alignment must contain no more than two mismatches [35, 36]. The putative miRNAs produced by miRDeep2 analysis were regarded as conservative miRNAs when it met the above criteria.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%