2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2005.01.019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Biases in internet sexual health samples: Comparison of an internet sexuality survey and a national sexual health survey in Sweden

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
68
0
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 104 publications
(77 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
5
68
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Our initial significant correlation between SOI and masculinity preferences concorded with the results of Waynforth et al (2005) and demonstrated the link in a heterogeneous sample of both students and non-students, including those of low socioeconomic status who may be less likely to engage in online university research (see, e.g., Ross, Mansson, Daneback, Cooper, & Tikkanen, 2005). Moreover, the fact that the behavioral components of SOI may be confounded with opportunity does not appear to preclude significant results and, indeed, attitude SOI failed to produce significant results in our sample.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 72%
“…Our initial significant correlation between SOI and masculinity preferences concorded with the results of Waynforth et al (2005) and demonstrated the link in a heterogeneous sample of both students and non-students, including those of low socioeconomic status who may be less likely to engage in online university research (see, e.g., Ross, Mansson, Daneback, Cooper, & Tikkanen, 2005). Moreover, the fact that the behavioral components of SOI may be confounded with opportunity does not appear to preclude significant results and, indeed, attitude SOI failed to produce significant results in our sample.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 72%
“…Thus, our recruitment strategy means we may have underestimated levels of internalized homonegativity and limited our generalizability of findings to MSM who use gay websites. Internet samples tend to be more urban, younger, single, and have higher education (Ross, Månsson, Daneback, Cooper, & Tikkanen, 2005). Several of the variables that were independently associated with IH at the p<.001 statistical significance level are too small to be considered practically significant.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Both in the US and abroad, increasing use of the Internet generally, and specifically by populations identified as most at risk for HIV, has coincided with rapid developments in using the Internet for both quantitative and qualitative research (Bockting, Huang, Ding, Robinson, & Rosser, 2005;Bockting et al, 2003;Bowen, 2006;Elford, Bolding, Davis, Sherr, & Hart, 2004a;McFarlane, Bull, & Rietmeijer, 2000;Rhodes, Bowie, & Hergenrather, 2003;Rhodes, DiClemente, Cecil, Hergenrather, & Yee, 2002;Ross, 2005;Ross, Daneback, Må nsson, Cooper, & Tikkanen, 2003;Ross, Må nsson, Daneback, Cooper, & Tikkanen, 2005;Ross, Tikkanen, & Må nsson, 2000;. At least five aspects of the Internet make it a significant advance in HIV prevention research.…”
Section: Critical Components In Internet-based Hiv Prevention Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%