Bias in Dobson total ozone measurements at high latitudes due to approximations in calculations of ozone absorption coefficients and air mass

Abstract

[1] The Dobson spectrophotometer is the primary standard instrument for ground-based measurements of total column ozone. The accuracy of its data depends on the knowledge of ozone absorption coefficients used for data reduction. We document an error in the calculations that led to the set of absorption coefficients currently recommended by the World Meteorological Organisation (WMO). This error has little effect because an empirical adjustment was applied to the original calculations before the coefficients were adopted by WMO. We provide evidence that this adjustment was physically sound. The coefficients recommended by WMO are applied in the Dobson network without correction for the temperature dependence of the ozone absorption cross sections. On the basis of data measured by Dobson numbers 80 and 82, which were operated by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) Climate Monitoring and Diagnostics Laboratory at the South Pole, we find that omission of temperature corrections may lead to systematic errors in Dobson ozone data of up to 4%. The standard Dobson ozone retrieval method further assumes that the ozone layer is located at a fixed height. This approximation leads to errors in air mass calculations, which are particularly relevant at high latitudes where ozone measurements are performed at large solar zenith angles (SZA). At the South Pole, systematic errors caused by this approximation may exceed 2% for SZAs larger than 80°. The bias is largest when the vertical ozone distribution is distorted by the ''ozone hole'' and may lead to underestimation of total ozone by 4% at SZA = 85°(air mass 9). Dobson measurements at the South Pole were compared with ozone data from a collocated SUV-100 UV spectroradiometer and Version 8 overpass data from NASA's Total Ozone Mapping Spectrometer (TOMS). Uncorrected Dobson ozone values tend to be lower than data from the two other instruments when total ozone is below 170 Dobson units or SZAs are larger than 80°. When Dobson measurements are corrected for the temperature dependence of the ozone absorption cross section and accurate air mass calculations are implemented, data from the three instruments agree with each other to within ±2% on average and show no significant dependence on SZA or total ozone. Citation: Bernhard, G., R. D. Evans, G. J. Labow, and S. J. Oltmans (2005), Bias in Dobson total ozone measurements at high latitudes due to approximations in calculations of ozone absorption coefficients and air mass,

Comparison of ground-based Brewer and FTIR total column O<sub>3</sub> monitoring techniques

“…It assumes that the absorbing compounds are concentrated at a single altitude h x and it disregards that the refraction index depends on altitude. The errors produced by these assumptions are important for low solar elevation angles (for an elevation angle of 10 • this error is 2-3% Bernhard et al, 2005). Taking the logarithm of Eq.…”

Wavelength calibration of Brewer spectrophotometer using a tunable pulsed laser and implications to the Brewer ozone retrieval

“…Under these assumptions, the ozone effective absorption is essentially obtained the same way as in the approximation method of Bernhard et al (2005) used with Dobson spectrophotometers (see Eq. 8).…”

“…The ozone absorption coefficient were defined as follows (Vanier and Wardle, 1969;Bernhard et al, 2005):…”

Quality assessment of the Ozone_cci Climate Research Data Package (release 2017): 1. Ground-based validation of total ozone column data products

“…The main issues that have to be taken into account during the validation process with these direct-sun instruments are: (a) TOC measurements from Dobsons spectrometers depend on the stratospheric effective temperature, which is manifested in 20 the comparisons as a seasonality effect (Basher, 1982;Bernhard et al, 2005), (b) even though the principles of operation between Dobsons and Brewers do not differ significantly, TOC measurements from the two types of instruments show small differences in the range of  0.6 % due to the use of different wavelengths and the different temperature dependence for the ozone absorption coefficients (Staehelin et al, 2003) and (c) due to the limited number and poor spatial distribution of stations with Brewer instruments in the Southern Hemisphere (all of them allocated in the Antarctic), the Dobson network is considered much more suitable to investigate spatial homogeneity of satellite products below the Equator. 5 TOC ground-based measurements from the abovementioned instruments have been extensively used in past publications for the purpose of analysis and validation of satellite data (see for e.g.…”