2016
DOI: 10.1007/s11661-016-3326-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bi-modal Structure of Copper via Room-Temperature Partial Recrystallization After Cryogenic Dynamic Compression

Abstract: PURE copper was compressed at high strain rates (over~3 9 10 3 s À1 ) under liquid nitrogen. This deformation resulted in bi-modal microstructures of ultrafine grains and abnormally grown micro grains, and in greater hardness (by~30 Hv) than room-temperature, dynamically deformed copper. This bi-modal microstructure is attributable to partial recrystallization at room temperature, activated by high-energy states and by twins generated at high ZenerHollomon parameter conditions. This result demonstrates a new a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For each material, two samples were rolled with the thermocouple attached in the middle of the sample, one for the cryogenic rolling and one for the room temperature rolling. Although the recovery seems to be the most reasonable process at room temperature, some authors such as Dong-Hyun et al 9 and Konkova et al 10 pointed out the recrystallization at RT with these metals. According to that, after completion of the rolling process, specimens were stored at LN 2 until testing, to avoid extensive recovery or even recrystallization at RT, and removed from LN 2 right before each test and the tests were performed immediately after the rollings.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For each material, two samples were rolled with the thermocouple attached in the middle of the sample, one for the cryogenic rolling and one for the room temperature rolling. Although the recovery seems to be the most reasonable process at room temperature, some authors such as Dong-Hyun et al 9 and Konkova et al 10 pointed out the recrystallization at RT with these metals. According to that, after completion of the rolling process, specimens were stored at LN 2 until testing, to avoid extensive recovery or even recrystallization at RT, and removed from LN 2 right before each test and the tests were performed immediately after the rollings.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most of the high strain rate, severe deformation studies published so far rely on uniaxial compression facilities where the deforming material is unconfined and is allowed to flow freely [5,6]. Such facilities can be of two types: (i) conventional upper-lower anvil type presses [5] or (ii) the split Hopkinson pressure bar system and their adaptations [6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most of the high strain rate, severe deformation studies published so far rely on uniaxial compression facilities where the deforming material is unconfined and is allowed to flow freely [5,6]. Such facilities can be of two types: (i) conventional upper-lower anvil type presses [5] or (ii) the split Hopkinson pressure bar system and their adaptations [6]. In addition few studies report the use of torsional deformation devices which can be either torsional Kolsky bar systems [7] or conventional torsion deformation devices [8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most of the high strain rate severe deformation studies published so far rely on uniaxial compression facilities where deforming material is unconfined and is free to flow in other directions [2][3][4][5][6][7]. Such compression facilities are either of conventional upper-lower anvil type [2][3][4] or based on the split Hopkinson bar system [5][6][7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most of the high strain rate severe deformation studies published so far rely on uniaxial compression facilities where deforming material is unconfined and is free to flow in other directions [2][3][4][5][6][7]. Such compression facilities are either of conventional upper-lower anvil type [2][3][4] or based on the split Hopkinson bar system [5][6][7]. Few of the studies involved application of torsional deformation using either a torsional Kolsky bar system [8][9] or conventional torsion deformation devices [10], again without any confinement of the deforming material which necessarily limits the amount of strain applied without material failure and can only be applied for materials with high intrinsic ductility.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%