2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.geoforum.2018.08.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Beyond the boma: A gendered approach to conceptualizing resource access in pastoral households

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These gender differences are evident in both the livestock and crop agriculture sectors. For livestock, there was differential access, preferences and roles amongst the Maasai pastoralists and elsewhere in Kenya (Mutua et al, 2017;Yurco, 2018;Nkedianye et al, 2019); amongst Somali pastoralists (Marshall et al, 2016); and in Ethiopia (Lunt et al, 2018). Although one study shows that there are no gender differences in ruminant disease priorities in Ethiopia (Alemu et al, 2019).…”
Section: Erential Agricultural Practices and Outcomesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These gender differences are evident in both the livestock and crop agriculture sectors. For livestock, there was differential access, preferences and roles amongst the Maasai pastoralists and elsewhere in Kenya (Mutua et al, 2017;Yurco, 2018;Nkedianye et al, 2019); amongst Somali pastoralists (Marshall et al, 2016); and in Ethiopia (Lunt et al, 2018). Although one study shows that there are no gender differences in ruminant disease priorities in Ethiopia (Alemu et al, 2019).…”
Section: Erential Agricultural Practices and Outcomesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The complexity and context-specific nature of both development and human nutrition—as well as the high cost of studies considering these dual components—has meant scarce research integrating nutritional evidence with assessments of specific development programs and their impacts on rural livelihoods ( Grace et al, 2018 ; Muehlhoff, Bennett, & McMahon, 2013 ). This disconnect between studies of nutrition and assessments of development policies may also owe to the fact that research on subsistence livestock systems generally focuses on how livestock are grazed rather than how livestock are managed for milk consumption ( Yurco, 2018 ). The emphasis on grazing management has led to a misguided assumption that development initiatives will improve nutrition if grazing capacity is enhanced ( Dugdill et al, 2013 ; Sadler et al, 2009 ).…”
Section: Assessing Milk Regimesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The emphasis on grazing management has led to a misguided assumption that development initiatives will improve nutrition if grazing capacity is enhanced ( Dugdill et al, 2013 ; Sadler et al, 2009 ). In Africa, development policies focusing on grazing are especially problematic as they overlook women’s roles in livestock systems (women most often manage animal health and milk while men attend to grazing duties) and can even create higher labor demands for women ( Njuki, Waithanji, Bagalwa, & Kariuki, 2013 ; Yurco, 2018 ).…”
Section: Assessing Milk Regimesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations