Beyond Known Barriers—Assessing Physician Perspectives and Attitudes Toward Introducing Open Health Records in Germany: Qualitative Study

Abstract

Background Giving patients access to their medical records (ie, open health records) can support doctor-patient communication and patient-centered care and can improve quality of care, patients’ health literacy, self-care, and treatment adherence. In Germany, patients are entitled by law to have access to their medical records. However, in practice doing so remains an exception in Germany. So far, research has been focused on organizational implementation barriers. Little is known about physicians’ attitudes and perspectives toward opening records in German primary care. Objective This qualitative study aims to provide a better understanding of physicians’ attitudes toward opening records in primary care in Germany. To expand the knowledge base that future implementation programs could draw from, this study focuses on professional self-conception as an influencing factor regarding the approval for open health records. Perspectives of practicing primary care physicians and advanced medical students were explored. Methods Data were collected through semistructured guide-based interviews with general practitioners (GPs) and advanced medical students. Participants were asked to share their perspectives on open health records in German general practices, as well as perceived implications, their expectations for future medical records, and the conditions for a potential implementation. Data were pseudonymized, audiotaped, and transcribed verbatim. Themes and subthemes were identified through thematic analysis. Results Barriers and potential advantages were reported by 7 GPs and 7 medical students (N=14). The following barriers were identified: (1) data security, (2) increased workload, (3) costs, (4) the patients’ limited capabilities, and (5) the physicians’ concerns. The following advantages were reported: (1) patient education and empowerment, (2) positive impact on the practice, and (3) improved quality of care. GPs’ professional self-conception influenced their approval for open records: GPs considered their aspiration for professional autonomy and freedom from external control to be threatened and their knowledge-based support of patients to be obstructed by open records. Medical students emphasized the chance to achieve shared decision making through open records and expected the implementation to be realistic in the near future. GPs were more hesitant and voiced a strong resistance toward sharing notes on perceptions that go beyond clinical data. Reliable technical conditions, the participants’ consent, and a joint development of the implementation project to meet the GPs’ interests were requested. Conclusions Open health record concepts can be seen as a chance to increase transparency in health care. For a potential future implementation in Germany, thorough consideration regarding the compatibility of GPs’ professional values would be warranted. However, the medical students’ positive attitude provides an optimistic perspective. Further research and a broad support from decision makers would be crucial to establish open records in Germany.

Mobile Access to Medical Records in Heart Transplantation Aftercare: Mixed-Methods Study Assessing Usability, Feasibility and Effects of a Mobile Application

“…A reason for this could be the fact that drug trough levels were transferred to the app automatically while physician’s letters were released manually. HCPs emphasized that this preselection of documents was important to avoid the risk of overburdening patients, which is a common concern [ 4 , 18 , 40 , 41 , 42 ]. However, whether the inconsistent availability of physician’s letters in app stemmed from technical issues or selective release remained unclear in this study and requires further investigation.…”

“…Although entitled by national law in Germany, only a few patients access information stored in electronic health records (EHR) [ 18 , 19 ]. At the Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany, the prerequisite for a patient-accessible medical record was met by implementing a web-based personal, cross-institutional health record, named “PEPA”, in 2016 [ 20 ].…”

“I think it's something that we should lean in to”: The use of OpenNotes in Canadian psychiatric care contexts by clinicians

“… 15 , 16 While research has demonstrated innumerable benefits when notes are openly shared with patients, 4 , 5 , 17 the notion that providing this access will do more harm than good for patients receiving psychiatric care prevails. 18 , 19 A variety of OpenNotes implementation resources have been developed for U.S. contexts; however, these have had limited applicability to Canadian environments. To bridge this gap, tailoring implementation strategies to the Canadian psychiatric environment is needed to enhance uptake of OpenNotes.…”

A Patient-Centered Approach to Writing Ambulatory Visit Notes in the Cures Act Era

“…Inviting patients as yet another audience member through "open notes" signifies a new era in health care and health technology.Since the original open notes study in 2010, 14 patient access to electronic notes has increased worldwide and is now nearly universal in the United States. 2,6,15,16 Patients want to read their notes, 17 are learning from them, 18,19 and report several benefits, including increased participation in care. 14 Research shows that patient engagement is associat-ed with better outcomes and lower costs, 14,20-23 but sharing visit notes also raises clinician anxiety and concerns about patient worry.…”

“…14 Research shows that patient engagement is associat-ed with better outcomes and lower costs, 14,20-23 but sharing visit notes also raises clinician anxiety and concerns about patient worry. 14,16,21,22,[24][25][26] Clinicians need low-burden, high-impact strategies for writing patient-centered notes that uphold communication between clinicians.Most note-writing guides to date have focused on the experience of clinicians. 27 Here, we build on these tips by integrating patient perspectives related to note-reading.…”