2017
DOI: 10.1080/08838151.2016.1273929
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bereaved Parents’ Online Grief Communities: De-Tabooing Practices or Relation-Building Grief-Ghettos?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
28
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
2
28
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Externalized CB expresses itself in hallucinations, delusions, and illusions, and represents attachment-seeking behavior and denial of the reality of the loss and death; these phenomena can be intrusive and disturbing for the bereaved (Field, 2006; Field & Filanowsky, 2010; Field et al, 1999). Internalized CB would be the soothing mental recall of the deceased, expressed through rituals, symbols, visiting graves, retaining objects and photos, or talking about the deceased (Christensen et al, 2017; Field & Filanosky, 2010; Field et al, 2005), as well as through various manifestations of identification with the deceased, such as taking on the traits, values, or beliefs of the lost person or doing things that would have pleased the deceased (Albuquerque et al, 2020; Foster et al, 2011). Field assumed that the internalized CB promoted good adjustment to loss, representing the continuation of a trusting and intimate relationship accompanied by identification with positive values and characteristics of the attachment figure.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Externalized CB expresses itself in hallucinations, delusions, and illusions, and represents attachment-seeking behavior and denial of the reality of the loss and death; these phenomena can be intrusive and disturbing for the bereaved (Field, 2006; Field & Filanowsky, 2010; Field et al, 1999). Internalized CB would be the soothing mental recall of the deceased, expressed through rituals, symbols, visiting graves, retaining objects and photos, or talking about the deceased (Christensen et al, 2017; Field & Filanosky, 2010; Field et al, 2005), as well as through various manifestations of identification with the deceased, such as taking on the traits, values, or beliefs of the lost person or doing things that would have pleased the deceased (Albuquerque et al, 2020; Foster et al, 2011). Field assumed that the internalized CB promoted good adjustment to loss, representing the continuation of a trusting and intimate relationship accompanied by identification with positive values and characteristics of the attachment figure.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As argued by Hoffmann and Jonas (2017), future Internet research would also benefit from problematizing ethical issues in terms of justice and fairness. In keeping with this perspective, Christensen et al (2017) have recently conceptualized mourners as counter-publics (Fraser, 1990) and thus (re)affirmed the political dimension of public grief expression. This axiological stance is not insignificant, as it goes beyond privacy issues and consent procurement, and focuses on the stigma associated with online mourning.…”
Section: Claims Thatmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…1 Université de Montréal, Québec, Canada 2 Université du Québec à Montréal, Québec, Canada (Bosticco & Thompson, 2005;Christensen, Hård af Segerstad, Kasperowski, & Sandvik, 2017;Walter, 1999). As Durkheim (1912Durkheim ( /2008 has pointed out long before social media came to be, "mourning is not the spontaneous expression of individual emotions."…”
Section: Research-article2018mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Implicit norms govern acceptable behavior, and in most Western societies, grieving too openly, too intensely or for too long is considered pathological behavior and therefore leads to self-blame among the bereaved (Scholtes & Browne, 2015). Bereaved parents often experience a lack of support and understanding for their situation, and an expectancy that they should move on, let go of their deceased child and get back to normal as soon as possible (Christensen et al, 2017).…”
Section: Stigma Of the Groups Studiedmentioning
confidence: 99%