Benevolent discrimination: Explaining how human resources professionals can be blind to the harm of diversity initiatives

Abstract

This article contributes to critical diversity management studies by exploring how human resources professionals do not see that the diversity measures they initiate can contribute to the reproduction of inequalities. We argue that framing such practices as benevolent obscures the fact that they are discriminatory acts. Drawing on the concept of benevolent discrimination, we conceptualise it along three dimensions: (1) a well-intended effort to address discrimination within (2) a social relationship that constructs the others as inferior and in need of help, which is granted with (3) the expectation that they will accommodate into the existing hierarchical order. Benevolent discrimination is a subtle and structural form of discrimination that is difficult to see for those performing it, because it frames their action as positive, in solidarity with the (inferior) other who is helped, and within a hierarchical order that is taken for granted. We develop the concept of benevolent discrimination building on an in-depth qualitative case study of a Swedish organisation that is believed to be exemplary in its engagement in diversity management initiatives. The organisation is however swayed by an inequality regime based on the intersection of class and ethnicity. We argue that it is precisely because human resources professionals frame their actions as acts of benevolence that they cannot see how they take part in organisational discrimination.

The Identity Regulation of Disabled Employees: Unveiling the ‘varieties of ableism’ in employers’ socio-ideological control

“…Such discursive identity regulation is materially enforced through a bureaucratic practice which, although developed with good intentions (cf. Romani, Holck, & Risberg, 2018), classifies workers as disabled (e.g. Garsten & Jacobsson, 2013) and requires disclosure of their bodily impairment and its disabling effects, imposing a negative disabled worker identity onto them.…”

Underemploying highly skilled migrants: An organizational logic protecting corporate ‘normality’

“…This shows the prominence of (societal and corporate) norms; a 'Swedish' way of working is posed as a norm that must be followed. Migrants are thus constructed as a risk in their deviation from this norm and this perceived deviation leads to ethnic structural discrimination at work between migrants and non-migrants (Behtoui et al, 2017;Romani et al, 2019;Tomaskovic-Devey et al, 2015). Our second contribution to studies on organizational approaches to employability, therefore, is the elucidation that normality is not a given: it is a socially constructed norm that reproduces ethnic structural inequality in the workplace.…”

Challenging the cross-national transfer of diversity management in MNCs: Exploring the ‘identity effects’ of diversity discourses

“…Almost all the women engineers we interviewed expressed their disgust at being positioned as recipients of special privileges and as 'needing help' (Romain et al 2018…”