2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.amepre.2012.11.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Abstract: SenseCam review seems to act as a cognitive stimulant in the short term, with higher neuropsychological assessment scores following SenseCam review compared to re-reading a diary.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

3
42
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
3
42
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Excepting a small number of studies [55,57,58,35,64], the majority have been reports of individual cases or small groups of users (n < 20). Consequently, the results observed to date need to be confirmed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Excepting a small number of studies [55,57,58,35,64], the majority have been reports of individual cases or small groups of users (n < 20). Consequently, the results observed to date need to be confirmed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Certain group studies have also focused on improved mnemonic performance with SenseCam during the normal aging process [58]. Silva et al [58] studied 15 young adults and 14 older adults focusing on the evaluation of a global effect (recall of information contained in the images was not measured) using standardized neuropsychological tests.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Two previous studies have also examined SC effects in older adults: St. Jacques et al (2015) found that reactivating memory with SC-like photos improved recognition performance, while Silva, Pinho, Macedo and Moulin (2013) found that reviewing images of day-to-day activities improved performance on standardised memory measures. The present study extends these findings to include improvement in memory for everyday events as a result of viewing SC images.…”
Section: Autobiographical Recallmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, most of this data was collected by asking the patients and their carers about what they remembered and how they felt, without structured and standardized measures. So far, from the studies that tested SenseCam as an external memory aid, only one study with healthy older adults tested subjective feelings about using SenseCam with objective measures (Silva et al, 2013). In this study, subjective measures (ratings in a Likert scale from one to seven) were taken for the following variables: 1) vividness of events; 2) the ability of the memory aid's to prompt additional memories; 3) surprise; 4) excitement; 5) feeling of alertness; 6) value of the memory aid; 7) feeling of re-experiencing the events.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%