Evolutionary Biology 2003
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4757-5190-1_4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Benefits of Polyandry: A Life History Perspective

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
155
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 165 publications
(158 citation statements)
references
References 93 publications
0
155
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Evidence that polyandry provides genetic benefits continues to mount (for reviews see Jennions and Petrie 2000;Griffith et al 2002;and Hosken and Stockley 2003), but the precise nature of these benefits remains obscure. In distinguishing between two of the major classes of indirect genetic benefits, the avoidance of genetic incompatibility and the acquisition of ''good genes'' (review in Zeh and Zeh 2003), it has become customary to attribute any increase in hatching success resulting from polyandry to a reduction in genetic incompatibility, whereas any increases in offspring viability and performance are typically attributed to genes obtained from superior sires (e.g., Tregenza and Wedell 1998;Kempenaers et al 1999;Simmons 2001;Sakaluk et al 2002).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Evidence that polyandry provides genetic benefits continues to mount (for reviews see Jennions and Petrie 2000;Griffith et al 2002;and Hosken and Stockley 2003), but the precise nature of these benefits remains obscure. In distinguishing between two of the major classes of indirect genetic benefits, the avoidance of genetic incompatibility and the acquisition of ''good genes'' (review in Zeh and Zeh 2003), it has become customary to attribute any increase in hatching success resulting from polyandry to a reduction in genetic incompatibility, whereas any increases in offspring viability and performance are typically attributed to genes obtained from superior sires (e.g., Tregenza and Wedell 1998;Kempenaers et al 1999;Simmons 2001;Sakaluk et al 2002).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Multiple mating can have both positive and negative effects on female fitness [1][2][3][4][5]. Together these benefits and costs determine the optimal mating rate of a female.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, polyandry is widespread, with females of most taxa mating with more than one male (Birkhead & Møller 1998). In species where females do obtain direct benefits from males, for example via nuptial gifts, the evolution of polyandry presents no great conundrum (Arnqvist & Nilsson 2000;Hosken & Stockley 2003). Moreover, a recent meta-analysis suggested that direct benefits drive polyandry in many insects (Arnqvist & Nilsson 2000), although this type of study cannot distinguish between adaptations to polyandry and benefits that could explain its prevalence.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several hypotheses have been proposed to explain the evolution of polyandry in the absence of direct female benefits (Harvey & May 1989;Birkhead et al 1993;Keller & Reeve 1995;Zeh & Zeh 1996;Yasui 1997;Hosken & Blanckenhorn 1999;Jennions & Petrie 2000;Tregenza & Wedell 2000Hosken & Stockley 2003). One of these, the good sperm hypothesis (Harvey & May 1989;Birkhead et al 1993;Yasui 1997), suggests that a male's success in sperm competition correlates with other aspects of his genetic quality.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%