2016
DOI: 10.1088/0022-3727/49/18/185301
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bending rigidity of transition metal dichalcogenide monolayers from first-principles

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

4
27
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
4
27
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This value is easily calculated in DFT and compares well to measurements of free-standing layers [80]. With this definition of the thickness, we agree well with the theoretical calculations of the bending rigidity of Lai et al [107]. We calculate the bending rigidity using the larger of the two in-plane Young's moduli and the maximum thickness of the layer, as reported in Table I.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 86%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This value is easily calculated in DFT and compares well to measurements of free-standing layers [80]. With this definition of the thickness, we agree well with the theoretical calculations of the bending rigidity of Lai et al [107]. We calculate the bending rigidity using the larger of the two in-plane Young's moduli and the maximum thickness of the layer, as reported in Table I.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 86%
“…As noted in Refs. [107] and [108], the definition of the thickness, d, of the thin plate is potentially ambiguous when dealing with twodimensional materials. Experimentally, the thickness of these materials frequently includes the height of the vdW gap.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The parameters , , , , , , , and were determined from previous DFT calculations 60,6567 ; alleviating the need to determine continuum plate theory parameters based on assumptions such as, e.g., effective plate thickness. Comparisons of plate theory with DFT calculations show that the two are in reasonable agreement (e.g., for the stiffness ) 67 . Thus, the primary assumption in the continuum plate theory is to only include the lowest order deformation terms in the elastic energy, consistent with the small strains encountered here ().…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, our fits predict that the bending rigidity of the 1T phase should be roughly 2 times larger than that of the 2H phase, consistent with the results in Figure . Experiments and simulations, have estimated the bending rigidity of the 2H phase in the range of approximately 7–13 eV. Thus, the SW model of MoS 2 predicts that the 1T phase would have a rigidity of roughly 14–24 eV, with additional contributions from energetics that are not captured in the SW model.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%