Benchmarking specialty hospitals, a scoping review on theory and practice

Abstract

BackgroundAlthough benchmarking may improve hospital processes, research on this subject is limited. The aim of this study was to provide an overview of publications on benchmarking in specialty hospitals and a description of study characteristics.MethodsWe searched PubMed and EMBASE for articles published in English in the last 10 years. Eligible articles described a project stating benchmarking as its objective and involving a specialty hospital or specific patient category; or those dealing with the methodology or evaluation of benchmarking.ResultsOf 1,817 articles identified in total, 24 were included in the study. Articles were categorized into: pathway benchmarking, institutional benchmarking, articles on benchmark methodology or -evaluation and benchmarking using a patient registry. There was a large degree of variability:(1) study designs were mostly descriptive and retrospective; (2) not all studies generated and showed data in sufficient detail; and (3) there was variety in whether a benchmarking model was just described or if quality improvement as a consequence of the benchmark was reported upon. Most of the studies that described a benchmark model described the use of benchmarking partners from the same industry category, sometimes from all over the world.ConclusionsBenchmarking seems to be more developed in eye hospitals, emergency departments and oncology specialty hospitals. Some studies showed promising improvement effects. However, the majority of the articles lacked a structured design, and did not report on benchmark outcomes. In order to evaluate the effectiveness of benchmarking to improve quality in specialty hospitals, robust and structured designs are needed including a follow up to check whether the benchmark study has led to improvements.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12913-017-2154-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Benchmarking of survival outcomes following haematopoietic stem cell transplantation: A review of existing processes and the introduction of an international system from the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation (EBMT) and the Joint Accreditation Committee of ISCT and EBMT (JACIE)

“…Accessed 31/05/ 2019), aims to provide a means of comparing clinical performance with the wider dataset. Benchmarking has become mandatory in a number of countries for a range of medical and surgical procedures and is used by competent authorities, regulators and payers for quality assurance of clinical effectiveness, safety and cost-effectiveness of patient care [1][2][3][4][5][6][7]. However, there are challenges in the delivery of benchmarking, particularly in defining a fair, accurate and clinically meaningful methodology acceptable to all stakeholders underpinned by a reliable and complete source of clinical outcomes data.…”

Quality management in Human Milk Banks: a scope review

“…This tool has been shown to be efficient when there is a need to analyze established metrics to improve practices and modify processes to provide more reliable decision making (43) . In contrast, a review on the effectiveness of benchmarking to improve quality in specialized hospitals has shown promising effects, however more robust and structured actions are needed for the use of the tool (44) .…”

The experience of Catalonia measuring nurse‐sensitive indicators: Trends study 2012–2018

“…As mentioned, the mission of the Results Centre is to measure, evaluate and disseminate the results that are gathered in field of health care by the different players in the all‐embracing public health system in Catalonia in order to promote benchmarking among centres and transparency towards society. Furthermore, it has been shown that comparison between health care centres contributes to an enhancement in outcomes and also to an important saving by improving the adequacy of procedures (Larsson et al., 2012; Wind & Van Harten, 2017). After having been established and developed over 7 years, the Results Centre has now become a reference tool in the Catalan health care system.…”