2007
DOI: 10.2166/wst.2007.604
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Abstract: Over a decade ago, the concept of objectively evaluating the performance of control strategies by simulating them using a standard model implementation was introduced for activated sludge wastewater treatment plants. The resulting Benchmark Simulation Model No 1 (BSM1) has been the basis for a significant new development that is reported on here: Rather than only evaluating control strategies at the level of the activated sludge unit (bioreactors and secondary clarifier) the new BSM2 now allows the evaluation … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
122
1
4

Year Published

2009
2009
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 221 publications
(129 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
2
122
1
4
Order By: Relevance
“…In 2007, the Benchmark Simulation Model No. 2 (BSM2) (Jeppsson et al, 2007;Nopens et al, 2010) was proposed by integrating the BSM1 with wastewater pre-treatment and a sludge train (Fig. 1).…”
Section: Brief Historical Overview Of Plant-wide Modellingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In 2007, the Benchmark Simulation Model No. 2 (BSM2) (Jeppsson et al, 2007;Nopens et al, 2010) was proposed by integrating the BSM1 with wastewater pre-treatment and a sludge train (Fig. 1).…”
Section: Brief Historical Overview Of Plant-wide Modellingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…on such performance indicators as EQI, OCI, and GHG emissions. Sweetapple et al (2013) presented the BSM-e, a modified version of BSM2 (Jeppsson et al, 2007) that is able to quantify on-site and off-site GHG emissions from a WWTP with the same configuration as the BSM2 (as detailed by Jeppsson et al, 2007 andNopens et al, 2010; Table 1). The BSM-e model differs from the BSM2G because it includes foursteps for denitrification, as detailed by Samie et al (2011), including stripping of N 2 O and CO 2 emissions, as suggested by Monteith et al (2005) (Table 1).…”
Section: Dynamic Mechanistic Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Originally, the same weighting factors were assigned to both TKN and NO 3 − , leading to the problem that a process control that achieves low concentrations of TKN in the effluent would not be rewarded. However, from an ecological point of view, low concentrations of TKN in the effluent are clearly preferential and, therefore, the weighting factors have been adapted accordingly [1,24].…”
Section: Effluent Quality Index (Eq) Used In Bsm Nomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The BSM No. 2 considers both pretreatment of the wastewater and sludge treatment, thus, including seasonal effects on the WWTP in terms of temperature variations and changing influent flow rate patterns [1]. The effluent quality is measured by the Effluent Quality Index (EQ), which considers the loads of suspended solids (SS) ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%