2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.lindif.2011.09.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Belief in a just world, teacher justice, and student achievement: A multilevel study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
17
0
6

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
(54 reference statements)
1
17
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, those with higher academic achievement (better marks) also reported more autonomy support from their teachers. This finding is also similar to previous research results (kamBle & dalBert 2012; Peter et al 2012). There were no gender differences in the perception of teacher behaviour.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In addition, those with higher academic achievement (better marks) also reported more autonomy support from their teachers. This finding is also similar to previous research results (kamBle & dalBert 2012; Peter et al 2012). There were no gender differences in the perception of teacher behaviour.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 94%
“…Whereas supportive teacher behaviour may increase student self-esteem and life statisfaction, it may decrease boredom, and help avoid problem behaviours such as substance use and depression (nett et al 2011;Walsh et al 2010). In addition, experience of teacher justice is a key feature of a school environment that is related to student achievement (Peter et al 2012), well-being (kamBle & dalBert 2011), self-e-steem and self-efficacy (correia & dalBert 2007), and less bullying behaviour (donat et al 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Research has shown that the perception of classroom justice may qualify the interactions between students and teachers (Chory‐Assad, Horan, Carton, & Houser, ; Peter, Kloeckner, Dalbert, & Radant, ), and it impacts learners’ adjustment and well‐being (Chory‐Assad, ; Dalbert & Stoeber, ; Oluwatayo, Aderonmu, & Aduwo, ). Moreover, several studies have provided interesting results concerning the relation between justice and several outcomes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, the mediation role of student agency on career decision‐making self‐efficacy remains unexplored and no studies, to our knowledge, have taken into account the combined mediation value of student agentic engagement and student responsibility for learning with regard to both academic achievement and career decision‐making self‐efficacy. Finally, although a number of scholars have highlighted the role of interpersonal justice for student paths (Kazemi, ; Molinari, Speltini, & Passini, ; Peter et al ., ; Resh & Sabbagh, ), its impact in relation to student agentic engagement, responsibility for learning and career decision‐making self‐efficacy is still underinvestigated.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Az ilyen nevelési attitűd (igazságos, szabálykövetést kérő partneri attitűd) esetén bár a nemek és a társadalmi háttér szerint nem volt eltérés, azonban az első évfolyamon tanulók érték el a legmagasabb pontszámot e faktor tekintetében, ami évfolyamonként csökken, majd a végzősök esetén ismételten növekszik. A jó tanuló diákok szintén a pedagógusok nagyobb igazságosságáról számoltak be, ez megegyezik a korábbi vizsgálatok eredményeivel Peter, Kloeckner, Dalbert és Radant, 2012), míg a sporttagozatos diákok nem gondolják, hogy tanáraik igazságosak. Az egészségmagatartással összefüggésben ok-okozati kapcsolatot nem tudunk levonni a keresztmetszeti elemzés miatt, de adataink azt erősítik meg, hogy azokra a diákokra, akik igazságosabbnak ítélik meg tanáraik viselkedését, nem jellemző a káros szerfogyasztás, ahogy kevésbé hajlamosak agresszív viselkedésre (saját mintánkban a verbális és pszichikai agresszióra érvényes, a fizikai agresszióra azonban nem) és nagyobb az énhatékonyságuk is.…”
Section: Részösszefoglalóunclassified