2018
DOI: 10.1080/17524032.2018.1470546
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Being Skeptical? Exploring Far-Right Climate-Change Communication in Germany

Abstract: This article explores climate-change communication by the German far right-spanning a continuum which ranges from anti-liberal democracy radical-right populists, to the extreme right and to antidemocratic neo-Nazis-and asks: how do these actors articulate the phenomenon of climate change? In responding to this question, we conduct a discourse network analysis which identifies relations between actors, objects, phenomena and processes, and point out differences/similarities across a continuum of exemplary far-r… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
31
0
2

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 77 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
31
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Less concern for climate injustice could make it easier to demand more evidence for climate change before admitting it. Climate change denial could also in part reflect opposition to transnational collaborations and international influences that are unavoidable when developing climate policies (Forchtner, Kroneder & Wetzel, 2018).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Less concern for climate injustice could make it easier to demand more evidence for climate change before admitting it. Climate change denial could also in part reflect opposition to transnational collaborations and international influences that are unavoidable when developing climate policies (Forchtner, Kroneder & Wetzel, 2018).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Populist antiestablishment views could help explain climate change denial (Forchtner, Kroneder & Wetzel, 2018). Indeed, dismissive discourses regarding climate change often portray the mainstream researchers as untrustworthy and corrupt (Cann & Raymond, 2018).…”
Section: Populist Antiestablishment Attitudesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Being an issue that needs to be solved through wide-ranging political solutions and societal reforms, climate change has become politicized in several countries, with politically right-leaning individuals expressing more climate change denial and opposition to climate policies than individuals that lean toward the left [4][5][6]. Recent analyses suggest that politicians and voters of far-right (i.e., radical and extreme) parties are particularly inclined to dismiss climate change [7][8][9], but only a few studies have empirically investigated possible explanations for this. The far right differs from the mainstream right in some important domains (most importantly in their focus on sociocultural issues and antiestablishment rhetoric instead of the traditional socioeconomic issues), which makes it unclear if the extant research results can be applied when explaining their views on climate change.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Forchtner et al. 2018 ). Mede and Schäfer ( 2020 , p. 484) refer to its specific arrangement as science-related populism, which they define in terms of a moral antagonism between “an (allegedly) virtuous ordinary people and an (allegedly) unvirtuous academic elite”.…”
Section: Communication Studies: Current Challenges and Prospects For mentioning
confidence: 98%