2017
DOI: 10.14214/df.240
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Behind the stability of boreal bog carbon sink: Compositional and functional variation of vegetation across temporal and spatial scales

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
2
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

2
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 66 publications
3
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This observation holds for each of the three growing seasons studied, which indicates that the spatial homogeneity of methane fluxes is not an artifact but a characteristic property of the studied bog. The same site has been previously shown to also have spatially homogeneous biomass production and net ecosystem exchange rates, except on bare peat surfaces with little vegetation (Karofeld, 2004;Korrensalo, 2017). We found only small spatial variation, as hummocks and high lawns had a higher methane flux than high hummocks and bare peat surfaces in 2013, and bare peat surfaces had a higher methane flux than high hummocks in 2014.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 50%
“…This observation holds for each of the three growing seasons studied, which indicates that the spatial homogeneity of methane fluxes is not an artifact but a characteristic property of the studied bog. The same site has been previously shown to also have spatially homogeneous biomass production and net ecosystem exchange rates, except on bare peat surfaces with little vegetation (Karofeld, 2004;Korrensalo, 2017). We found only small spatial variation, as hummocks and high lawns had a higher methane flux than high hummocks and bare peat surfaces in 2013, and bare peat surfaces had a higher methane flux than high hummocks in 2014.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 50%
“…This contradicts the hypothesis that methane emissions would be higher from wet plant community types that have thin aerobic peat layer for methane consumption and more aerenchymatous vegetation to transport methane from peat straight to the atmosphere, as found earlier in different peatland ecosystems (Bubier et al, 1993;Saarnio et al, 1997;MacDonald et al, 1998;Frenzel and Karofeld, 2000;Laine et al, 2007). However, the result of this study (I) is in line with the previous study that found the biomass production and net ecosystem exchange rates in the same bog site to also be similar between the plant community types, except for the bare peat surfaces that were small carbon sources (Korrensalo, 2017). Therefore, the evenness of carbon dynamics between different plant community types seems to be characteristic to the site.…”
Section: Methane Fluxes and Their Controlssupporting
confidence: 92%
“…The upscaled flux was further weighted by the aerial cover of the six community types of the study area (88.4 %) (Fig. 2), which was based on vegetation inventories conducted over the 30 m radius study area in July 2012 and 2013 (Korrensalo, 2017). For upscaling the ebullition fluxes, total average ebullition flux was first calculated as a sum of average ebullition fluxes from open water pools and bare peat surfaces that were weighted with their relative surface area (11.6 % and 15.3 %) (Fig.…”
Section: Upscaling the Chamber And Ebullition Measurements To The Eco...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We expected to find higher methane fluxes from wetter plant community is not an artifact but a characteristic property of the studied bog. The same site has been previously shown to have also spatially homogeneous biomass production and net ecosystem exchange rates, except on bare peat surfaces with little vegetation (Korrensalo, 2017). We found only small spatial variation, as hummocks had higher methane flux in 2013 than the other plant community types.…”
supporting
confidence: 54%
“…This can partly 370 explain our result that methane fluxes from drier plant community types were similar to the fluxes measured from wetter plant community type. Moreover, Korrensalo (2017) showed that biomass production rates on the same bog site are similar among the plant community types, except on bare peat surfaces that produce very little biomass. This can also partly explain our result, as methane emission has a positive correlation with primary production (Whiting and Chanton, 1993;Rinne et al, 2017).…”
mentioning
confidence: 94%