1992
DOI: 10.1016/0370-2693(92)91816-r
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Behaviour of the topological susceptibility across the deconfining phase transition

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

3
46
1

Year Published

1994
1994
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
3
46
1
Order By: Relevance
“…These results have been confirmed by many collaborations by using cooling [3,16,17] * (see however [18]) and by counting fermionic zero modes [19], including studies for N ≥ 4 colours.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 56%
“…These results have been confirmed by many collaborations by using cooling [3,16,17] * (see however [18]) and by counting fermionic zero modes [19], including studies for N ≥ 4 colours.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 56%
“…Armed with the new method, the topological susceptibility has been measured across the deconfinement transition [9] without the ambiguities of the cooling method [23,24]. Inverse blocking is not the only technique to avoid cooling.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There have been calculations of the temperature dependence of the topological susceptibility in pure SU(2) [7,8], pure SU(3) [9], as well as unquenched SU(3) with two light quark flavors [10]. However, these authors vary the temperature by adjusting the coupling constant, making it tricky to compare the susceptibility at different temperatures because of the different lattice length scales.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, these authors vary the temperature by adjusting the coupling constant, making it tricky to compare the susceptibility at different temperatures because of the different lattice length scales. At larger β finite size effects may plague the calculations using small (e.g., 8 3 × 4) lattices. There is also some confusion on the behavior of the susceptibility in the SU(2) theory.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%