2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.jveb.2014.08.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Behavior of laboratory beagles towards humans: Assessment in an encounter test and a simulation of experimental situations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
7
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
2
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, the beagles showed a high level of tolerance during all test provocations and examinations. These results agree with a previous study (Döring et al, 2014), in which eas. In the present study, the dogs came from a facility in which they had restricted access to outdoor areas, making it difficult to separate resting and elimination areas.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 94%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Furthermore, the beagles showed a high level of tolerance during all test provocations and examinations. These results agree with a previous study (Döring et al, 2014), in which eas. In the present study, the dogs came from a facility in which they had restricted access to outdoor areas, making it difficult to separate resting and elimination areas.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 94%
“…The age groups puppies (< 0.5 years), juveniles (0.5-2 years) and adults (> 2 years) were those used by Wells and Hepper (2000) and Döring et al (2014Döring et al ( , 2016. With a t-test, we analyzed if vocalization during isolation in Test 1 differed between dogs kept in single versus group housing.…”
Section: Variablementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The heart rate of the dogs was measured with a stethoscope (for 15 s) after the test sections provocation, examination and feeding. The videos were evaluated according to Döring et al (2014Döring et al ( , 2016. Behavioral reactions were recorded and scored as defined in Tables S1 1 and S2 1 and ranged from 0 (fearful/unwanted behavior) to 3 (relaxed/desired behavior).…”
Section: Behavior Testmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Playing, chasing, being covered by a cloth and feeding were not scored because we did not want to judge the associated behaviors as wanted or unwanted. The body language was scored as defined in Döring et al (2014) with a range from 0.5 (submissive) to 3 (relaxed). same person.…”
Section: Behavior Testmentioning
confidence: 99%