Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2004
|
Sign up to set email alerts
Bed rest in singleton pregnancies for preventing preterm birth
Search citation statements
Order By: Relevance
Paper Sections
Select...
153
6
5
1
Citation Types
1
37
0
2
Year Published
Range
2000
20002026
2026Publication Types
Select...
80
65
17
Relationship
0
162
Authors
Journals
Cited by 162 publications
(40 citation statements)
References 18 publications
1
37
0
2
Order By: Relevance
Abstract
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…The differences in AR recommendations for preventing preterm birth in cases of PPROM, in twin pregnancies, in bleeding episodes caused by placenta praevia, and in cases of IUGR are consistent with the results of several Cochrane Reviews [1,2,6,19,26,29] . These reviews could neither support nor refute routinely recommended bed rest and/or hospitalisation to prevent preterm birth because of the lack of sufficient evidence from the few included trials.…”
Section: Discussion
supporting
confidence: 82%
Abstract
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…The differences in AR recommendations for preventing preterm birth in cases of PPROM, in twin pregnancies, in bleeding episodes caused by placenta praevia, and in cases of IUGR are consistent with the results of several Cochrane Reviews [1,2,6,19,26,29] . These reviews could neither support nor refute routinely recommended bed rest and/or hospitalisation to prevent preterm birth because of the lack of sufficient evidence from the few included trials.…”
Section: Discussion
supporting
confidence: 82%
Abstract
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…Therefore, tertiary-level hospitals are likely to provide more tocolytic hospitalizations. On the other hand, such physician and institutional variations are noteworthy in light of evidence that for women with preterm labor, tocolysis may be unnecessary, often ineffective, and occasionally harmful [9,13,14,36,37]. Is it possible that ineffective and poor outcomes of inpatient tocolytic treatments are associated with the physician and institutional variations observed in this study?…”
Section: Discussion
mentioning
confidence: 80%
Abstract
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…13 reviews addressed mechanical [7] or pharmaceutical prevention of PTB or miscarriage [8-12], the impact of other interventions targeted at influencing PTB or miscarriage [13-15], or analysed screening/risk assessment interventions to predict PTB risk and improve pregnancy outcomes [16-19]; two reviews analysed the effect of ultrasound screening on pregnancy outcomes [20,21] (Additional file 3: Table S1b). Seven reviews either addressed the prevention [22,23], the detection [24] or the treatment of infection [25-28] (Additional file 3: Table S1c).…”
Section: Results
mentioning
confidence: 99%
Abstract
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…The differences in AR recommendations for preventing preterm birth in cases of PPROM, in twin pregnancies, in bleeding episodes caused by placenta praevia, and in cases of IUGR are consistent with the results of several Cochrane Reviews [1,2,6,19,26,29] . These reviews could neither support nor refute routinely recommended bed rest and/or hospitalisation to prevent preterm birth because of the lack of sufficient evidence from the few included trials.…”
Section: Discussion
supporting
confidence: 82%
Abstract
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…Therefore, tertiary-level hospitals are likely to provide more tocolytic hospitalizations. On the other hand, such physician and institutional variations are noteworthy in light of evidence that for women with preterm labor, tocolysis may be unnecessary, often ineffective, and occasionally harmful [9,13,14,36,37]. Is it possible that ineffective and poor outcomes of inpatient tocolytic treatments are associated with the physician and institutional variations observed in this study?…”
Section: Discussion
mentioning
confidence: 80%
Abstract
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…13 reviews addressed mechanical [7] or pharmaceutical prevention of PTB or miscarriage [8-12], the impact of other interventions targeted at influencing PTB or miscarriage [13-15], or analysed screening/risk assessment interventions to predict PTB risk and improve pregnancy outcomes [16-19]; two reviews analysed the effect of ultrasound screening on pregnancy outcomes [20,21] (Additional file 3: Table S1b). Seven reviews either addressed the prevention [22,23], the detection [24] or the treatment of infection [25-28] (Additional file 3: Table S1c).…”
Section: Results
mentioning
confidence: 99%
Abstract
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…The differences in AR recommendations for preventing preterm birth in cases of PPROM, in twin pregnancies, in bleeding episodes caused by placenta praevia, and in cases of IUGR are consistent with the results of several Cochrane Reviews [1,2,6,19,26,29] . These reviews could neither support nor refute routinely recommended bed rest and/or hospitalisation to prevent preterm birth because of the lack of sufficient evidence from the few included trials.…”
Section: Discussion
supporting
confidence: 82%
Abstract
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…Therefore, tertiary-level hospitals are likely to provide more tocolytic hospitalizations. On the other hand, such physician and institutional variations are noteworthy in light of evidence that for women with preterm labor, tocolysis may be unnecessary, often ineffective, and occasionally harmful [9,13,14,36,37]. Is it possible that ineffective and poor outcomes of inpatient tocolytic treatments are associated with the physician and institutional variations observed in this study?…”
Section: Discussion
mentioning
confidence: 80%
Abstract
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…13 reviews addressed mechanical [7] or pharmaceutical prevention of PTB or miscarriage [8-12], the impact of other interventions targeted at influencing PTB or miscarriage [13-15], or analysed screening/risk assessment interventions to predict PTB risk and improve pregnancy outcomes [16-19]; two reviews analysed the effect of ultrasound screening on pregnancy outcomes [20,21] (Additional file 3: Table S1b). Seven reviews either addressed the prevention [22,23], the detection [24] or the treatment of infection [25-28] (Additional file 3: Table S1c).…”
Section: Results
mentioning
confidence: 99%