“Because they are connected”: Linking structural inequalities in farmworker organizing

Abstract

Agriculture in the United States (US), long dominated by white male interests, is rooted in entrenched structural inequalities. Prominent among them is the power of growers over a dependable low-wage racialized and gendered workforce that is disciplined with the threat of their disposability. Workers and other activists have long responded with opposition. We advance radical food geography scholarship with a relational understanding of the structural inequalities that farmworkers experience and their resistance through farmworker movements, by centering the perspectives and experiences of activists with an intersectional praxis. We begin with a review of the compounding economic, political, and social inequalities experienced by farmworkers in the US in the context of xenophobic enforcement-first approaches to policing documented and undocumented Latinx immigrants. We then present a case study of Community to Community Development (C2C) in Washington state, an example of the radical frontlines of resistance by farmworker advocacy groups, as they link systems of oppression, especially with regard to class, immigration status, gender, and race. Ultimately, we argue for elevating more intersectional forms of organizing in the food system. In doing so, we encourage radical food geographers to conduct scholarship-activism more open to the many intersections between social position and structural inequality and resistance.

Farms and gardens everywhere but not a bite to eat? A critical geographic approach to food apartheid in Salt Lake City

“…Big Food is buoyed by governmental policies that both hide and externalize the true costs of food such that small farmers are unable to compete in the marketplace (Windham, 2007). For example, international neoliberal policy and labor programs such as the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA), Central America Free Trade Agreement (CAFTA), and the U.S.'s H-2A immigration program enable Big Food to generate an underpaid and precarious agricultural workforce with limited access to organized labor rights advocacy (Sbicca et al, 2020). These types of trade policies, also referred to as immigrant subsidies, enable commercial growers to hire 'guest workers' to enter the U.S. for agricultural work, and have been widely criticized for labor rights abuses of immigrant workers akin to modern-day slavery (Bauer & Steward, 2013;Coalition of Immokalee Workers, 2020).…”

Practices of Care and Relationship-Building: A Qualitative Analysis of Urban Agriculture’s Impacts on Black People’s Agency and Wellbeing in Philadelphia

“…The exploitation of migrant workers and other farmworkers is often tied to profit-driven agricultural businesses [ 73 ]. Many of these businesses focus more on yields than they do on the health, safety, and wellbeing of their workers.…”

Toward healthier futures in post‐pandemic times: Political ecology, racial capitalism, and black feminist approaches to care

“…During the pandemic, many care laborers have faced an outsized risk of exposure to COVID‐19 even as they have no or little access to health care (Kaur‐Gill, 2020; Méndez et al., 2020; Nasol & Francisco‐Menchavez, 2021). Migrant care workers—both documented and undocumented—across the globe are particularly vulnerable (Sbicca et al., 2020; Silvey & Parreñas, 2020). The exploitation of care laborers stems from the differentiation of racial capitalism at multiple, entangled scales, and maps onto colonial relations of racialized hierarchies of power (Noxolo et al., 2012; Raghuram, 2012).…”