2022
DOI: 10.1002/mp.15449
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Beam properties within the momentum acceptance of a clinical gantry beamline for proton therapy

Abstract: Purpose Energy changes in pencil beam scanning proton therapy can be a limiting factor in delivery time, hence, limiting patient throughput and the effectiveness of motion mitigation techniques requiring fast irradiation. In this study, we investigate the feasibility of performing fast and continuous energy modulation within the momentum acceptance of a clinical beamline for proton therapy. Methods The alternative use of a local beam degrader at the gantry coupling point has been compared with a more common up… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, because of the spill cycle used by synchrotrons the energy layer switching time (ELST) is greater. In a recent publication reported values of ELST from a selection of proton therapy centers range from 0.2 to 2 s for synchrotrons and from 0.08 to 0.9 s for cyclotrons 23 . At our center the average ELST is approximately 0.9 s. The minimum value of 0.2 s reported for synchrotrons is achieved through the use of a multi‐energy extraction (MEE) system that allows a single spill of protons to be used for multiple energy layers.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In addition, because of the spill cycle used by synchrotrons the energy layer switching time (ELST) is greater. In a recent publication reported values of ELST from a selection of proton therapy centers range from 0.2 to 2 s for synchrotrons and from 0.08 to 0.9 s for cyclotrons 23 . At our center the average ELST is approximately 0.9 s. The minimum value of 0.2 s reported for synchrotrons is achieved through the use of a multi‐energy extraction (MEE) system that allows a single spill of protons to be used for multiple energy layers.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The current study investigates the use of a MRF in a cyclotron system with an ESS, which has a different beam production and delivery mechanism and therefore a different relationship between the spot map and beam delivery time. In particular, the energy layer switching time (ELST) is dramatically longer for synchrotrons 23 . Another important difference between synchrotron and cyclotron systems is the shape of the Bragg peak, particularly for low‐energy beams.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the distal fall‐off of the dose distribution has some dependence on the momentum spread used, the momentum spectrum at the isocenter is expected to have a negligible change due to these losses as they will only occur in the tails of the momentum distribution. In this respect, it is important that, due to the achromatic beam optics, the lateral beam size at the isocenter is independent of the momentum spread of the beam 18 . As such it would make it interesting to add the momentum spread as one of the parameters to be optimized in the treatment planning.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this respect, it is important that, due to the achromatic beam optics, the lateral beam size at the isocenter is independent of the momentum spread of the beam. 18 As such it would make it interesting to add the momentum spread as one of the parameters to be optimized in the treatment planning.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For cyclotron-based facilities, the energy change time ranges from 80 to 900 ms (Giovannelli et al 2022). However, for most synchrotron-based facilities, it is even slower ranging from 200 to 2000 ms (Giovannelli et al 2022). Thus, reducing the number of energy layers would improve the beam delivery efficiency.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%