2010
DOI: 10.1016/s1674-5264(09)60236-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bayesian discriminant analysis for prediction of coal and gas outbursts and applicatio

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The priori probability is used to describe awareness of the research objects before extracting samples and then the posteriori probability is obtained to modify the prior probability based on the extracted samples. [21,22] In the present study, a variety of statistical inferences were highlighted by the posteriori probability. A total of 443 samples in the training set were used to construct Bayesian discriminant criterion and discriminant functions of six tea categories.…”
Section: Distance Discriminant Analysis and Bayesian Discriminant Anamentioning
confidence: 71%
“…The priori probability is used to describe awareness of the research objects before extracting samples and then the posteriori probability is obtained to modify the prior probability based on the extracted samples. [21,22] In the present study, a variety of statistical inferences were highlighted by the posteriori probability. A total of 443 samples in the training set were used to construct Bayesian discriminant criterion and discriminant functions of six tea categories.…”
Section: Distance Discriminant Analysis and Bayesian Discriminant Anamentioning
confidence: 71%
“…(2008) ascertained the relationship between the factors and hazards of coal and gas outbursts by multifactor pattern recognition and then predicted the hazard of each prediction unit. Wang et al. (2010) established a predictive model based on Bayesian discriminant analysis and attained reasonable results that completely coincided with the actual situation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…Zhang et al (2008) ascertained the relationship between the factors and hazards of coal and gas outbursts by multifactor pattern recognition and then predicted the hazard of each prediction unit. Wang et al (2010) established a predictive model based on Bayesian discriminant analysis and attained reasonable results that completely coincided with the actual situation. Zhang and Lowndes (2010) applied a coupled artificial neural network and fault tree analysis model to the prediction of coal and gas outbursts, and the results indicated that the combined solution method could explicitly recognize model relationships between the geological conditions and the potential risk of outbursts.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…The previous single disaster prediction method is no longer applicable, and the prediction difficulty of coal-gas compound dynamic disaster is greatly increased [12]. At present, the previous research on the prediction of rockburst and coal-gas outburst is quite fruitful [13][14][15][16][17][18]. However, the research on the prediction of coal-gas compound dynamic disaster is relatively less.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%