2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.reactfunctpolym.2006.04.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Batch adsorption performance of methyl methacrylate/styrene copolymer membranes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The signals of phenyl’s protons of 3#, 2#, and 1# became weaker in comparison with the one of 4#, indicating that the phenyls of 3#, 2#, and 1# had a chemical environment different from the one of 4#. The protons of CH 2 and CH (b, a) made the polymer 4# exhibit another two clear peaks at 1.8 and 1.5 ppm (Kowalewska 2008 ); however, these protons’ chemical environments changed with the introduction of BA, and the peaks of the protons of CH and CH 2 (f, g) appeared near 1.5 ppm, which was in accordance with the findings of Chiu et al ( 2006 ). There were no peaks within the range of 3.3–4.3 ppm for the polymer 4#.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 90%
“…The signals of phenyl’s protons of 3#, 2#, and 1# became weaker in comparison with the one of 4#, indicating that the phenyls of 3#, 2#, and 1# had a chemical environment different from the one of 4#. The protons of CH 2 and CH (b, a) made the polymer 4# exhibit another two clear peaks at 1.8 and 1.5 ppm (Kowalewska 2008 ); however, these protons’ chemical environments changed with the introduction of BA, and the peaks of the protons of CH and CH 2 (f, g) appeared near 1.5 ppm, which was in accordance with the findings of Chiu et al ( 2006 ). There were no peaks within the range of 3.3–4.3 ppm for the polymer 4#.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 90%
“…The dry flow ( F D ) and wet flow ( F W ) were measured. The filter flow ( F ) can be measured through Equation (4), and the pore diameter distribution ( B ) was defined by Equation (5) [19]:Ffalse(%false)=FWFD×100% Bfalse(%false)=FCFPDPDC×100% where D C is the permeation flux of the membrane, D P is the pore diameter of the previous operating pressure, F C is the filter flow of the current operating pressure and F P is the filter flow of the previous operating pressure.…”
Section: Experimental Methods and Materialsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The pore diameter distribution (PDD) was measured using a capillary flow porosimetry system (CFP-1100-A*1 Porous Materials, USA) [19]. The dry flow (F d ) and wet flow (F w ) were measured and the filter flow (F f ) was calculated by equation ( 2)…”
Section: Pore Diameter Distribution Measurementmentioning
confidence: 99%