2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.pbb.2014.03.020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Baseline-dependent modulating effects of nicotine on voluntary and involuntary attention measured with brain event-related P3 potentials

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
28
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 96 publications
1
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Nicotine administration enhances ERP indices of both top down and bottom up attention and cholinergic mediated decorrelation of neuronal activity in V1 increases response reliability of neurons under both goal oriented, trained paradigms as well as during observation of naturalistic movies (Goard and Dan, 2009; Knott et al, 2014; Pinto et al, 2013). Enhancing cholinergic tone may therefore increase signal to noise ratios and facilitate stimulus detection whether or not performance is goal-oriented.…”
Section: Cholinergic Signaling and Circuits Involved In Attention mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nicotine administration enhances ERP indices of both top down and bottom up attention and cholinergic mediated decorrelation of neuronal activity in V1 increases response reliability of neurons under both goal oriented, trained paradigms as well as during observation of naturalistic movies (Goard and Dan, 2009; Knott et al, 2014; Pinto et al, 2013). Enhancing cholinergic tone may therefore increase signal to noise ratios and facilitate stimulus detection whether or not performance is goal-oriented.…”
Section: Cholinergic Signaling and Circuits Involved In Attention mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent evidence also indicates that transdermal nicotine can increase sustained attention in adult nonsmokers with poorer attentiveness, but negatively impacts participants higher in attentiveness (Poltavski and Petros, 2006). In nonsmokers, findings by Knott et al (2014) generally support baseline-dependent nicotine effects on both voluntary and involuntary neural aspects of attention as measured by ERPs. Such findings in nonsmokers suggest baseline-dependent nicotine effects separate from mere withdrawal alleviation, in support of Perkins’ (1999) model.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 52%
“…Consistent with baseline-dependency, Patterson et al (2010) recently found that poorer working memory on a rapid information processing task (the N-Back) during nicotine abstinence predicted more rapid resumption of smoking in individuals attempting smoking cessation. Baseline-dependent effects of nicotine have also been observed for P3 event-related potential amplitudes during involuntary novel auditory processing in nonsmokers, demonstrating increased attentional enhancement by nicotine only in individuals with relatively poor attentional capacity (Knott et al 2014). We are not aware of studies assessing the influence of existing placebo-baseline deficits on covert spatial attention enhancement by nicotine in smokers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Previous work has shown that the P3b is enhanced following nicotine and tobacco use. 23,24 Although the P3b was not significantly influenced by product type, this may reflect the relatively smaller sample size of the present investigation. Previous work has also generally demonstrated modulation of the N2 in response to nicotine and tobacco use, although the results have been mixed (for a review see: Pritchard et al 22 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 66%
“…In line with this notion, previous research has shown that traditional cigarettes, or nicotine alone, can enhance alpha suppression, 18-21 N2, 22 and P3b amplitude. [22][23][24] EEG and ERPs have previously been used as a way to assess the effect of tobacco or nicotine on attention and brain state arousal. 18,23,[25][26][27][28][29][30] However, to our knowledge, this is the first study employing EEG in conjunction with traditional subjective measures of consumer acceptability in order to compare a variety of smokeless tobacco products.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%