Improving Energy Efficiency in Industrial Energy Systems 2012
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4471-4162-4_5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Barriers to Energy Efficiency from a Sociotechnical Perspective

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…First, this is an explorative research. This study may be undermined by methodological bias due to the idiosyncrasies of the case—the EMUP project focuses on upscaling diffusion and generic energy-efficiency technology (Thollander & Palm, 2012; Waid & Brunner, 2011)—and sampling bias of interviewees. We have enhanced the construct validity through the well-framed process and used the triangulation of interviewees to reduce data bias; however, we still need future studies to strengthen and validate of our findings.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, this is an explorative research. This study may be undermined by methodological bias due to the idiosyncrasies of the case—the EMUP project focuses on upscaling diffusion and generic energy-efficiency technology (Thollander & Palm, 2012; Waid & Brunner, 2011)—and sampling bias of interviewees. We have enhanced the construct validity through the well-framed process and used the triangulation of interviewees to reduce data bias; however, we still need future studies to strengthen and validate of our findings.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous studies of energy efficiency in the industry demonstrate that energy efficiency is primarily a management issue, as it is only when the management level in an organization prioritizes energy efficiency that substantial purposeful activities occur (Thollander and Palm, 2013; Thollander and Palm, 2015; Sorrell, 2015; Christoffersen et al , 2006). Networking between companies has proven to be important for effective energy management (Apeaning and Thollander, 2013; Thollander and Ottosson, 2008; Trianni et al , 2013; Christoffersen et al , 2006; Johansson, 2015; Russell, 2005).…”
Section: Industrial Energy Efficiency and Policy Networkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Evaluations of Swedish industrial energy-efficiency programmes find that only approximately 40 per cent of potentially financially viable energy-efficiency measures are implemented (Trygg et al , 2010). Many studies identify great potential to reduce both industrial energy use and greenhouse gas emissions (Harris et al , 2000; Schleich, 2004; Thollander et al , 2007; Thollander and Palm, 2013; Lunt et al , 2014; Johansson, 2015; Barbetta et al , 2015; Trianni and Cagno, 2012). Although this is an important issue, it is not something that generally falls within the purview of local governments.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since these low carbon products and processes should be integrated into end-users' lifestyle, behavioral changes would be made accordingly (Ellegård and Palm, 2011). While it is perceived that energy saving through end-user behavioral changes may have larger potentials than generally assumed (Sunikka-Blank and Galvin, 2012), pervasive changes in end-users' energy behaviors are found tremendously difficult (Axsen and Kurani, 2012) due to the inertia (Jensen, 2005) and possible risks (Thollander and Palm, 2013). These barriers would be furthermore accentuated by the information and communication gaps between end-users and other stakeholders, e.g.…”
Section: Reducing Demandmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These barriers would be furthermore accentuated by the information and communication gaps between end-users and other stakeholders, e.g. construction professionals (Newsham et al, 2009), manufacturers and suppliers (Thollander and Palm, 2013) and government agencies (Ellegård and Palm, 2011). Moreover, due to a high degree of heterogeneity across end-users (Ma et al, 2013), the effects of the practical on behavioral changes vary considerably (Ellegård and Palm, 2011), which often renders the technical solutions less effective.…”
Section: Reducing Demandmentioning
confidence: 99%