Barriers and Solutions for Improving Pain Management Practices in Acute Hospital Settings: Perspectives of Healthcare Practitioners for a Pain-Free Hospital Initiative

Abstract

Background: Effective pain management is a fundamental human right. However, global disparities in pain management practices exist across health settings. This study explored healthcare practitioners' views on pain management in the acute care hospital setting. Methods: The focus groups included clinical specialties most likely to encounter patients with 'difficult to manage pain', namely those in the Geriatrics and Palliative Care Unit (2 doctors and 3 nurses), Critical Care Unit (7 doctors), and the Pain Management Team (3 doctors and 2 nurses). The transcripts were analyzed using a qualitative thematic analysis. Results: The data analysis revealed four themes. Theme 1, 'Being too safe' described the presence of apprehensive attitudes among patients and healthcare practitioners that limits the appropriate use of diverse and tailored pain medications in acute care hospital settings. Theme 2, 'Working as a team' described the need for collaborative approaches to achieve hospital-wide evidence-based pain management. Theme 3, 'Adaptation for local and cultural preferences' explored how pain was perceived through cultural lenses and suggested strategies to tailor pain management to local and cultural preferences. Finally, Theme 4, 'Driving acute pain management forward' listed clinician solutions for improving pain management in acute care hospital settings toward a pain-free hospital initiative. Conclusion: Despite advances in pain medicine and pain teaching strategies, effective pain management is proportionate to both clinical and cultural preferences. Future studies should investigate the standardization of global pain management tools and guidelines to fit the local culture and context.

Effectiveness of collaboration between oncology pharmacists and anaesthesiologists for inpatient cancer pain management: A pilot study in Taiwan

“… 11 A previous report described clinicians’ attitudes toward pain typically focused on pathophysiology first rather than the quality of life linking to cultural, societal and other factors. 12 Management of cancer pain should be proactive and driven by an understanding of pain mechanisms; and it should include the optimal use of multimodality interventions provided by a consultation with pain or palliative medicine physicians. 13 Studies have shown that pharmacists can have a positive impact on clinical care by leading or collaborating with interdisciplinary teams to identify drug-related problems.…”

Comparing the Effect of Lidocaine-Prilocaine Cream and Infiltrative Lidocaine on Overall Pain Perception During Thoracentesis and Abdominocentesis: A Randomized Clinical Trial

“…Acute pain management is a core ethical concept in medical practice (1). During thoracentesis and abdominocentesis, pain management is routinely managed with 1% lidocaine with a 25 gauge needle for skin and a smaller gauge needle for deeper tissue (2,3).…”

“…During thoracentesis and abdominocentesis, pain management is routinely managed with 1% lidocaine with a 25 gauge needle for skin and a smaller gauge needle for deeper tissue (2,3). As the anesthetic injection is painful in and of itself (4), during these two procedures, pain management can sometimes fall short due to a lack of education and incorrect personal opinions (1,5). One such example is "one needle insertion can cause less pain than two-needle insertions" (5).…”

What Should We Do to Help Lessen Older Patients’ Pain?

“…I read the article by Akbar et al 1 ) with great interest, as chronic pain in older persons is one of the most common conditions encountered by healthcare professionals, especially in acute-care hospitals. However, it is the least-heeded problem in hospitals, nursing homes, and home care.…”