2004
DOI: 10.1016/s1389-9341(02)00080-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Barriers and facilitators to integration among scientists in transdisciplinary landscape analyses: a cross-country comparison

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
94
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 87 publications
(96 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
1
94
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There is some debate on the extent to which research is coordinated and integrated. While some suggest that multidisciplinary research is coordinated, but not integrated [47]; others contend that there is no coordination, but there is integration at a low level [5]. In general, it is hard to imagine that the research is not, in some way coordinated whilst maintaining even a slight degree of coherence, but it may indeed not be integrated.…”
Section: Multidisciplinaritymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…There is some debate on the extent to which research is coordinated and integrated. While some suggest that multidisciplinary research is coordinated, but not integrated [47]; others contend that there is no coordination, but there is integration at a low level [5]. In general, it is hard to imagine that the research is not, in some way coordinated whilst maintaining even a slight degree of coherence, but it may indeed not be integrated.…”
Section: Multidisciplinaritymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The term 'crossdisciplinary' is also used in the literature in the same sense [5][6][7]-however, it has also been used in the past to define a particular type of multidisciplinarity [8]. Further, it suggests boundaries are simply crossed rather than integrated and thus would appear to emphasise weaker forms of integrated research [9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…One could argue that everybody is free to use and define the concepts in his or her own way. Of course, the plurality of definitions is legitimate; however, the studies of Jakobsen et al (2004) and Tress et al (in press) revealed that the lack of common understanding of integrative research concepts is a key barrier to integration in landscape projects and to communication between researchers. Project participants cannot exchange views on project experiences related to integrative research concepts when such concepts are used differently.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%