Barriers and facilitators of rendering HIV services by community health workers in sub-Saharan Africa: a meta-synthesis protocol

Abstract

IntroductionIn sub-Saharan Africa (SSA), Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) is the leading cause of morbidity and mortality. Community healthcare workers (CHWs) worldwide have been reported to be effective in strengthening the HIV programme by providing services such as adherence support, HIV education and safe sex education as part of their roles. The main aim of this meta-synthesis is to synthesise qualitative evidence on studies that have been conducted in SSA countries to understand the barriers to and facilitators of providing HIV services by CHWs across all settingsMethods and analysisThis meta-synthesis will be guided by Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses. An initial search was conducted on 15 November 2019 for studies published between 2009 and 2019 using the population exposure outcome nomenclature. We searched the EBSCOHost- (ERIC; Health Source-Nursing/Academic Edition), Google Scholar and PubMed databases for the relevant studies. The Ritchie and Spencer framework will be used for data synthesis and the Supporting the Use of Research Evidence Framework analysis will be used to analyse data. We will conduct critical appraisal on selected studies using the Qualitative Assessment and Review Instrument to limit risk of bias.Ethics and disseminationThis review does not involve any human participants and therefore ethical approval will not be required. We will publish the protocol as well as the findings in any relevant journal and various media namely conferences; symposia, local and international health stakeholders.PROSPERO registration numberCRD42020160012.ConclusionEvidence from this review will provide synthesised evidence to the utilisation of CHWs in HIV services in SSA.

Barriers and facilitators to the utilization of the intensive adherence counselling framework by healthcare providers in Uganda: a qualitative study

“…Procedurally, we used the SURE framework to guide the data collection and analysis with focus on three specific categories of barriers and facilitators that health care providers typically face when implementing policy options in African health systems [ 15 ]. Increasingly, researchers in sub-Saharan Africa are adopting the use of the SURE framework; the closest examples being a systematic review by Gugulethu et al 2020 where the researchers were looking at barriers and facilitators of rendering HIV services by community health workers in sub-Saharan Africa [ 20 ], and Wakida et al 2019 looking at Health system constraints in integrating mental health services into primary healthcare in rural Uganda [ 21 ].…”

Assessing attitudes to ED-based HIV testing: Development of a short-structured survey instrument

“…This is supported by our results, wherein providers expressed discomfort in approaching patients for HCT, in disclosing the results of a positive test, and expressed a right to refuse care to HIV positive patients. Discomfort may be rooted in cultural stigma against individuals positive for HIV, wherein despite gains in knowledge a subset of physicians, across the globe, perceive no ethical difficulty in denying medical care to patients infected with HIV [ 51 ]. Fueling this notion, former President of South Africa, Thabo Mbeki and his administration established policy that denied access to treatment for individuals with HIV/AIDS.…”

How do the older adults in nursing homes live with dignity? A protocol for a meta-synthesis of qualitative research

“…[29][30][31] The meta-synthesis will be guided by an interpretive paradigm that aims to ensure researchers distance themselves from their views and ideas. [32][33][34][35] We have chosen this paradigm because it encourages researchers to construct and interpret their understanding of collected data based on participants' experiences or reported data, without imposing their views or experiences. We will include all relevant qualitative studies regardless of the methodology employed (eg, phenomenology, content analysis, anthropology).…”