1992
DOI: 10.1007/3-540-55719-9_114
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Barbed bisimulation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
286
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 337 publications
(286 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
286
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Previous solutions have been to either require that two processes are related if and only if they are bisimilar under all possible contexts (see [17]) or to derive a labelled transition system manually. Since the first solution needs quantification over all possible contexts, proofs of bisimilarity can be very complicated.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous solutions have been to either require that two processes are related if and only if they are bisimilar under all possible contexts (see [17]) or to derive a labelled transition system manually. Since the first solution needs quantification over all possible contexts, proofs of bisimilarity can be very complicated.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, input actions cannot be observed by an external observer and only output actions are observable in AbC . By following Milner and Sangiorgi [20], we use the term "barb" as synonymous with observable. In what follows, we shall use the following notations:…”
Section: Reduction Barbed Congruencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Barbed equivalences have been introduced in [21] for CCS, and have become the standard behavioural equivalences for formalisms equipped with unlabeled reduction semantics. Intuitively, barbs are basic observations (predicates) on the states of a system.…”
Section: Saturated Barbed Bisimilaritymentioning
confidence: 99%