2011
DOI: 10.1080/10599231.2011.570618
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bank Lending Channel of Monetary Policy: Dynamic Panel Data Study of Malaysia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
26
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
7
26
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, small banks are more sensitive to monetary policy shocks than large banks, because of asymmetric information, agency cost and the banks' financial position. Many previous studies have considered both macro and firm level variables in modeling the determinants of the bank loan supply, for example Ehrmann et al (2002), Hosono (2006) and Abdul Karim et al (2011). These studies believed that the macroeconomic environment and bank specific variables are important factors in influencing the behaviour of the bank loan supply.…”
Section: Theoretical Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…However, small banks are more sensitive to monetary policy shocks than large banks, because of asymmetric information, agency cost and the banks' financial position. Many previous studies have considered both macro and firm level variables in modeling the determinants of the bank loan supply, for example Ehrmann et al (2002), Hosono (2006) and Abdul Karim et al (2011). These studies believed that the macroeconomic environment and bank specific variables are important factors in influencing the behaviour of the bank loan supply.…”
Section: Theoretical Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, Windmeijer (2005) argued that the two-step GMM is better than the one-step GMM in determining coefficients with low bias and standard error. This is because the two-step GMM uses finite sample corrected standard errors (Abdul Karim et al 2011;Roodman 2009;Windmeijer 2006). The system GMM generates many instruments that over-fit the endogenous variables and weaken the Hansen Test.…”
Section: Gmm Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations