2015
DOI: 10.1093/jee/tov226
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Balancing Bt Toxin Avoidance and Nutrient Intake byHelicoverpa zea(Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) Larvae

Abstract: To evaluate how the Cry1Ac Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt) toxin and the ratio of dietary protein to carbohydrate (P:C) independently and jointly affect Helicoverpa zea (Boddie) larval feeding performance and behavior, we conducted no-choice and binary choice experiments using chemically defined diets. We tested two related strains of this polyphagous pest: a strain selected for resistance to Cry1Ac in the laboratory (GA-R), and its field-derived parent strain (GA). In no-choice tests, feeding performance in GA an… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…26 The ratio of dietary protein to carbohydrate (P:C) affected both the toxicity of Cry1Ac and the fitness costs of resistance to Cry1Ac in H. zea, indicating that seasonal changes in P:C ratios could also affect suitability of Bt and non-Bt cotton. [36][37]63 In accord with a previous study, 5 we did not detect significant fitness costs affecting survival on young non-Bt cotton (feeding was initiated 79 DAP in Brévault et al 5 and 83 DAP for young cotton here). However, seasonal changes in cotton induced large fitness costs that reduced survival on old cotton in this study (feeding experiment initiated 122 DAP).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…26 The ratio of dietary protein to carbohydrate (P:C) affected both the toxicity of Cry1Ac and the fitness costs of resistance to Cry1Ac in H. zea, indicating that seasonal changes in P:C ratios could also affect suitability of Bt and non-Bt cotton. [36][37]63 In accord with a previous study, 5 we did not detect significant fitness costs affecting survival on young non-Bt cotton (feeding was initiated 79 DAP in Brévault et al 5 and 83 DAP for young cotton here). However, seasonal changes in cotton induced large fitness costs that reduced survival on old cotton in this study (feeding experiment initiated 122 DAP).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…The two subsets of each strain were crossed every two or three generations to reduce effects of inbreeding depression . The two subsets of GA‐R were periodically selected for resistance to Cry1Ac, by exposing at least 2500 GA‐R neonates per subset (total selected 5000) to MVPII (Dow Agrosciences, San Diego, CA, USA) overlaid on artificial diet . Larvae that were third or higher instars after 7 days of feeding on treated diet (20 or 30 µg cm −2 ) were scored as resistant to Cry1Ac.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For example, increased locomotory activity and ballooning behaviors are thought to be the result of larval toxin detection and avoidance (Benedict et al, 1992; Men et al, 2005; Prasifka et al, 2009; Goldstein et al, 2010; Ramalho et al, 2014). Furthermore, in binary choice tests, larvae from GA-R preferred to feed on a nutritionally optimal Cry1Ac diet relative to a non-Bt suboptimal diet, while larvae form GA consumed more of the suboptimal non-Bt diet (Orpet et al, 2015b). This suggests that detection and consumption of a nutritionally optimal diet supersedes toxin avoidance behaviors in GA-R.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here, we used a genome scanning approach to compare previously described Cry1Ac-selected and unselected lines of H. zea (Brévault et al, 2013, 2015; Orpet et al, 2015a, 2015b; Welch et al, 2015; Carrière et al, 2018a). We identified six regions of the genome showing signatures of selection, one of which includes a novel gene from the cadherin family, which has been shown to comprise genes associated with Cry resistance in other lepidopteran species (Gahan et al, 2001; Fabrick et al, 2014; Zhang et al, 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%