2017
DOI: 10.1186/s13229-017-0152-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Balanced bifrontal transcranial direct current stimulation enhances working memory in adults with high-functioning autism: a sham-controlled crossover study

Abstract: BackgroundWorking memory (WM) often is impaired in autism spectrum disorder (ASD). Such impairment may underlie core deficits in cognition and social functioning. Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) has been shown to enhance WM in both healthy adults and clinical populations, but its efficacy in ASD is unknown. We predicted that bifrontal tDCS would improve WM performances of adults with high-functioning autism during active stimulation compared to sham stimulation and that such enhancement would ge… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
46
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 113 publications
1
46
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Of course, more research is needed to draw well-documented conclusions. Other authors have described improvements in particular aspects of adult ASD patients such as working memory and better syntax acquisition following single-dose anodal tDCS over the left and right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (first case) or exclusively over the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex [ 13 , 37 ] There were also positive changes in P300 ERP, but due to the low number of subjects in whom it was possible to carry out the passive oddball paradigm, we cannot make any comparison between the two different stimulating methods. Unfortunately, sample sizes for EEG-based connectivity analysis and ERP paradigm could not include all the patients, because, in close relationship with the complexity of the used method, when we carried out their initial electrophysiological evaluation (before intervention), not all recordings had a high enough quality for analysis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Of course, more research is needed to draw well-documented conclusions. Other authors have described improvements in particular aspects of adult ASD patients such as working memory and better syntax acquisition following single-dose anodal tDCS over the left and right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (first case) or exclusively over the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex [ 13 , 37 ] There were also positive changes in P300 ERP, but due to the low number of subjects in whom it was possible to carry out the passive oddball paradigm, we cannot make any comparison between the two different stimulating methods. Unfortunately, sample sizes for EEG-based connectivity analysis and ERP paradigm could not include all the patients, because, in close relationship with the complexity of the used method, when we carried out their initial electrophysiological evaluation (before intervention), not all recordings had a high enough quality for analysis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The mechanisms of action consists in facilitating or inhibiting synaptic transmission, via increasing or decreasing the frequency of action potentials in endogenous neuronal firing, rather than generating action potentials per se (as in rTMS). In recent years, tDCS has been intensively investigated as a treatment for psychiatric disorders, including ASD …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Eight studies exclusively utilized tDCS as the therapeutic tool [ 33 - 40 ], 23 studies utilized solely rTMS as the therapeutic tool [ 41 - 63 ], and one study used both rTMS and tDCS to evaluate their therapeutic effects on ASD [ 64 ]. Six of the included articles were case-reports [ 35 , 40 , 43 , 47 , 49 , 53 ], nine were non-controlled trials [ 36 , 37 , 41 , 46 , 55 , 57 , 61 , 62 , 64 ], and the remaining 17 were controlled trials [ 33 , 34 , 38 , 39 , 42 , 44 , 45 , 48 , 50 - 52 , 54 , 56 , 58 - 60 , 63 ]. Eleven of the controlled studies used a sham group as the control [ 33 , 34 , 38 , 39 , 42 , 48 , 50 - 52 , 54 , 63 ] and the remaining six compared neuromodulated patients with waitlist controls.…”
Section: Synthesized Findingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Six of the included articles were case-reports [ 35 , 40 , 43 , 47 , 49 , 53 ], nine were non-controlled trials [ 36 , 37 , 41 , 46 , 55 , 57 , 61 , 62 , 64 ], and the remaining 17 were controlled trials [ 33 , 34 , 38 , 39 , 42 , 44 , 45 , 48 , 50 - 52 , 54 , 56 , 58 - 60 , 63 ]. Eleven of the controlled studies used a sham group as the control [ 33 , 34 , 38 , 39 , 42 , 48 , 50 - 52 , 54 , 63 ] and the remaining six compared neuromodulated patients with waitlist controls. Totally, 467 patients with ASD (mean age of 16.19) were treated by neuromodulation techniques in all included studies (383 patients received rTMS and 84 patients received tDCS).…”
Section: Synthesized Findingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation