2004
DOI: 10.1038/modpathol.3800132
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bacterial vaginosis: comparison of Pap smear and microbiological test results

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
21
0
3

Year Published

2008
2008
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
1
21
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Regarding the method for the diagnosis of bacterial vaginosis, although Amsel's criteria are more often used in the clinical setting [28], the Nugent scoring system has a higher reproducibility [29], with comparable sensitivity and specificity to the former criteria [28, 30, 31]. …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Regarding the method for the diagnosis of bacterial vaginosis, although Amsel's criteria are more often used in the clinical setting [28], the Nugent scoring system has a higher reproducibility [29], with comparable sensitivity and specificity to the former criteria [28, 30, 31]. …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Pap smear was also specific, with a range of 94% to 98%. Each of the studies concluded that the Pap smear would give accurate diagnostic results [44,45,48]. A large study was undertaken by Giacomini et al [47] in 1997.…”
Section: Bacterial Vaginosismentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The vaginal flora shifts from the dominant aerobic Lactobacillus to predominantly anaerobic organisms including G. vaginalis, Bacteroides species, Mobiluncus species, and Mycoplasma hominis [44,45]. Under normal circumstances, lactobacilli produce an acidic medium in the vagina by the production of hydrogen peroxide, which transforms glycogen to lactic acid.…”
Section: Bacterial Vaginosismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the Pap test is not designed to diagnose the presence of microorganisms, its use for this purpose until the present day is a routine and remains controvsial [12,13]. When comparing its performance to that end, encouraging results are found in the diagnosis of Gardnerella vaginalis [10,14].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 85%