2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.bej.2013.05.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bacterial cellulose–alginate composite sponge as a yeast cell carrier for ethanol production

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
31
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…97%). In addition, it was surprising that the change rules of the compressive and tensile strength were opposite for the CM‐BC/SA composite (similar to BCA), both of these two mechanical properties declined with the supplementation of CM‐BC, but when the content of CM‐BC was up to 75%, they increased significantly.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…97%). In addition, it was surprising that the change rules of the compressive and tensile strength were opposite for the CM‐BC/SA composite (similar to BCA), both of these two mechanical properties declined with the supplementation of CM‐BC, but when the content of CM‐BC was up to 75%, they increased significantly.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Immobilization provides enhanced ethanol productivity in many ways. These include reduction of contamination; [35][36][37] easy separation of cell mass from the liquid medium; 36 enhanced stability of ethanol production; 38 reduced production costs; 39,40 decreased fermentation times; 34 providing cells for several cycles of fermentation; 41 and providing good barriers against inhibitors. 38 Disadvantages of immobilization may include gel degradation, significant substrate and product mass transfer limitation, and gel particle distruption due to CO 2 production and leakage of microorganisms.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These include reduction of contamination; [35][36][37] easy separation of cell mass from the liquid medium; 36 enhanced stability of ethanol production; 38 reduced production costs; 39,40 decreased fermentation times; 34 providing cells for several cycles of fermentation; 41 and providing good barriers against inhibitors. 38 Disadvantages of immobilization may include gel degradation, significant substrate and product mass transfer limitation, and gel particle distruption due to CO 2 production and leakage of microorganisms. 42 Immobilization of the major ethanol producers S. cerevisiae and Z. mobilis for ethanol production has been investigated using various substrates including mahula flowers, 43 molasses, 44 starchy sweet potato, 45 and cassava.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Meanwhile, bioethanol yield on free cells system was only 8.0% (v/v) for 74.4% of total sugar consumed [36]. Bioethanol concentration with the immobilized cells system in cellulose-alginate membrane was 92.1 g/L, while the free cell was only 87.9 g/L [7].…”
Section: Immobilization Of Yeast Cells To Sugarcane Bagassementioning
confidence: 97%
“…The current bioethanol research is mostly focused on reducing the costs of production and improving feedstock pretreatment, saccharification, and the fermentation process [4]. Immobilized cell technology has been recommended as an alternative and an effective method for improving bioethanol fermentation [5][6][7]. Immobilized cell can improve the productivity of bioethanol by two or three times by increasing the cell density [8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%