1994
DOI: 10.1016/0013-4694(94)90065-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Background EEG activity in preterm infants: correlation of outcome with selected maturational features

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
46
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 80 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
7
46
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The interburst interval was calculated manually. It was defined as a period between electrical bursts during which activities were Ͻ30 V in all leads (18). Voltage was confirmed using the manufacturer's software (Micromed) when in doubt.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The interburst interval was calculated manually. It was defined as a period between electrical bursts during which activities were Ͻ30 V in all leads (18). Voltage was confirmed using the manufacturer's software (Micromed) when in doubt.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hayakawa et al, 6 using 8-channel conventional EEG, also found brief episodes of continuous activity as early as 23 weeks' GA. Connell et al 25 found brief periods of continuous activity at 26 weeks' GA. Other authors did not find continuous activity at these early GAs. 5,26 However, this discrepancy may be explained by differences in the study population. Further, most of the infants in our study received caffeine citrate for treatment of apnea.…”
Section: E64mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…This finding is in agreement with conventional EEG studies, in which amplitudes up to 500 V may still be physiologic. 26 The present study aimed to establish normal values and patterns for aEEG activity in healthy preterm infants Ͻ30 weeks of gestation. However, the criteria of what constitutes a healthy, normal preterm infant are not easy to define, because prematurity itself is a pathology.…”
Section: E64mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The EEG recordings were obtained from eight active electrodes (Fp1-Fp2, C3-C4, O1-O2, T3-T4 of the International 10 -20 System) applied to the scalp using adhesive paste. From each tracing, 30 min of artifact-free recording was analyzed and the following parameters were evaluated (Biagioni et al, 1994(Biagioni et al, , 1996: (1) for maximum interval duration (seconds), an interval was taken as a period of low activity (Ͻ30 V) in all leads; (2) for minimum burst duration (seconds), a burst was defined as waves emerging from the low activity of the interval in at least half of the leads (waves Ͼ30 V observed in less than half of the leads were considered to interrupt the interval but were not taken to be bursts), and the beginning of the first wave and the end of the last one were taken as the onset and the offset of the burst; (3) for incidence of 8 -20 Hz, activities superimposed on ␦ waves (the ␦ brush pattern): they were only considered present on a burst when reaching at least one-half of their maximum amplitude; and (4) incidence of temporal sawtooth (i.e., a rhythmic regular 4 -7 Hz activity, detectable on temporal regions).…”
Section: Electrophysiological Measuresmentioning
confidence: 99%