2016
DOI: 10.1080/11663081.2016.1168230
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Axiomatisation of general concept inclusions from finite interpretations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
24
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
1
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For a given X ⊆ C I and a role depth d there may be multiple MMSCs (always at least one [8]) but they are logically equivalent. So we write 'the' MMSC of X with role depth d (in symbols mmsc (X, I, d)), meaning a representative of such class of concepts.…”
Section: Description Graphs Products and Unravellingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…For a given X ⊆ C I and a role depth d there may be multiple MMSCs (always at least one [8]) but they are logically equivalent. So we write 'the' MMSC of X with role depth d (in symbols mmsc (X, I, d)), meaning a representative of such class of concepts.…”
Section: Description Graphs Products and Unravellingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lemma 20. [8] Let I = (∆ I , • I ) be a finite EL ⊥ interpretation. For all X ⊆ ∆ I and k ∈ N, it holds that ∅ |= mmsc mmsc (X, I, k) I , I, k ≡ mmsc (X, I, k) .…”
Section: B Proofs For Sectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The advantage of this approach is that logic formula can be further processed in an automatic manner for more discovered knowledge. In [18], concepts of FCA are extracted and generalized into logic description. At a higher level, logical axioms are extracted by finite interpretations on concept lattice [18].…”
Section: B a Logical Generalization Of Formal Concept Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%