2008
Avoiding Secondary Skin Graft Donor Site Morbidity in the Fibula Free Flap Harvest
Abstract: To compare donor site morbidity in patients who have undergone fibula free flap reconstruction in which the skin graft was taken from the expected cutaneous paddle of the fibula with the known complications of the popular technique of obtaining a split-thickness skin graft (STSG) from a secondary donor site.
Search citation statements
Paper Sections
Select...
20
8
6
1
Citation Types
1
26
1
0
Year Published
2011
2025
Publication Types
Select...
27
4
Relationship
0
31
Authors
Journals
Cited by 31 publications
(28 citation statements)
References 9 publications
1
26
1
0
“…A common concern with the OC‐RFFF donor site is the risk of radius fracture (Zenn et al 1997; Vaughan 1990; Richardson et al 1997). In this study, all OC‐RFFF donor sites underwent prophylactic plating, and we experienced one radius fracture (2.1%), consistent with prior published studies (Day et al 2014; Ho et al 2013; Kim et al 2008). Bowers et al (2000) reported on prophylactically plating the distal radius, with multiple other studies confirming the safety of this method (Arganbright et al 2013; Shnayder et al 2011).…”
Section: Discussion
supporting
confidence: 89%
“…A common concern with the OC‐RFFF donor site is the risk of radius fracture (Zenn et al 1997; Vaughan 1990; Richardson et al 1997). In this study, all OC‐RFFF donor sites underwent prophylactic plating, and we experienced one radius fracture (2.1%), consistent with prior published studies (Day et al 2014; Ho et al 2013; Kim et al 2008). Bowers et al (2000) reported on prophylactically plating the distal radius, with multiple other studies confirming the safety of this method (Arganbright et al 2013; Shnayder et al 2011).…”
Section: Discussion
supporting
confidence: 89%
“…Complication rates related to the FFF donor site are reported to be high (Ho et al 2013). Kim et al (2008) reported an STSG loss of 13% in their FFF donor sites, which is lower than our reported patients. In their study, they harvested the graft from the donor site skin paddle.…”
Section: Discussion
contrasting
confidence: 80%
“…8 However, the latter can be used for the maturation and contraction of large wounds to reduce the amount of autograft required for final coverage. 9 In this case patient, TheraSkin was used as a temporizing measure but was also found to reduce the amount of required skin graft by nearly 70%. The soleus flap used to conceal the tibia is visible prior to TheraSkin use.…”
Section: Discussion
mentioning
confidence: 82%
“…In wound reconstruction, split-thickness skin autografts provide optimal viability and tissue development compared with cellular and/or tissue-based products 8 . However, the latter can be used for the maturation and contraction of large wounds to reduce the amount of autograft required for final coverage 9 . In this case patient, TheraSkin was used as a temporizing measure but was also found to reduce the amount of required skin graft by nearly 70%.…”
Section: Discussion
mentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Because the success rates have remained high in experienced hands, there has to be an evolution in tailoring these flaps in such a way as to minimize both recipient and donor site issues. This has been the trend over the past few years 7,8…”
Section: Comment
mentioning
confidence: 88%
