2000
DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1098-2418(200005)16:3<240::aid-rsa2>3.0.co;2-v
|Get access via publisher |Summarize |Cite
Average-case analyses of first fit and random fit bin packing
Abstract: ABSTRACT:We prove that the First Fit bin packing algorithm is stable under the input distribution U k − 2 k for all k ≥ 3, settling an open question from the recent survey by Coffman, Garey, and Johnson ["Approximation algorithms for bin backing: A survey," Approximation algorithms for NP-hard problems, D. Hochbaum (Editor), PWS, Boston, 1996]. Our proof generalizes the multidimensional Markov chain analysis used by Kenyon, Sinclair, and Rabani to prove that Best Fit is also stable under these distributions [P…
Search citation statements
Paper Sections
Select...
28
6
1
0
Citation Types
0
29
0
0
Year Published
2000
2025
Publication Types
Select...
19
7
5
Relationship
1
30
Authors
Journals
Cited by 31 publications
(29 citation statements)
References 16 publications
0
29
0
0
“…Some of this has been proved. In [19] it was shown that EW BF n (U {k − 2, k}) = O(1) for all k > 0, and this result was extended to F F in [1]. In [4] it was shown that…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…Some of this has been proved. In [19] it was shown that EW BF n (U {k − 2, k}) = O(1) for all k > 0, and this result was extended to F F in [1]. In [4] it was shown that…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…The expected waste rate EW A n (F ) for an algorithm A and distribution F is defined to be the expected value of W A (L n (F )) as a function of n. In what follows we typically abbreviate this as simply the "expected waste." We say a distribution F is a bounded waste distribution if EW OP T n (F ) = O (1). As a consequence of Theorem 1 and a classification theorem of Courcoubetis and Weber [11], we can prove the following.…”
mentioning
confidence: 73%
“…For the on-line algorithms FF and BF, the situation is no better. Although they can be shown to have O(1) waste when j = O(v/k) [2], when j = k -2 [1,12], and (in the case of BF) for specified pairs (j, k) with k _< 14 [5], for most values of (j, k) it appears experimentally that the expected waste of BF and FF is linear, and this has been proved for BF and the pairs (8,11) and (9,12) Turning to less distribution-specific results, the first relevant results concerned off-line algorithms. Karmarkar and Karp in [11] presented an off-fine deterministic polynomial time algorithm KI( that for any list L in our setting guarantees that KK(L) < OPT(L)+O(log 2 B).…”
Section: Previous Resultsmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…The average case behavior under discrete distributions for standard heuristics has been studied in [1,2,3,5,6,12]. These papers concentrated on the discrete uniform distributions U{j, k} mentioned above, where the bin capacity B = k and the item sizes are 1,2,... ,j < k, all equally likely.…”
Section: Previous Resultsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…, J B , Coffman et al [5] showed the expected waste for J = B or J = B − 1 grows as Θ(nB 1 2 ) for First Fit, and Θ(n 1 2 log B) for Best Fit. For J = B − 2, bounded expected waste for Best Fit was showed by Kenyon et al [11], and for First Fit (using Random Fit as an intermediate step) by Albers and Mitzenmacher [1]. Kenyon and Mitzenmacher [10] proved that the waste under Best Fit is linear when J = αB, and 99 150 < α < 100 150 , B large enough but is conjectured to hold for all 0 < α < 1.…”
Section: Review Of Bin Packing Literaturementioning
confidence: 94%
