2020
DOI: 10.1103/physrevapplied.13.034075
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Autotuning of Double-Dot Devices In Situ with Machine Learning

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

3
43
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
3
43
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, the transport features that indicate the device is tuned as a double quantum dot are time-consuming to measure and difficult to parametrise. Machine learning techniques and other automated approaches have been used for tuning quantum devices [5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14] . These techniques are limited to small regions of the device parameter space or require information about the device characteristics.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, the transport features that indicate the device is tuned as a double quantum dot are time-consuming to measure and difficult to parametrise. Machine learning techniques and other automated approaches have been used for tuning quantum devices [5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14] . These techniques are limited to small regions of the device parameter space or require information about the device characteristics.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To further illustrate the advantages of our algorithm, we compared its performance with a Nelder-Mead numerical optimisation method applied to achieve automatic tuning of quantum dots 38,43 . To ensure a fair comparison with our reinforcement-learning method, our implementation of the Nelder-Mead optimisation (see Supplementary Note E. for further details) was terminated when the CNN classified a block as exhibiting bias triangles in the same way as our DRL algorithm, i.e., when the output value of the CNN classifier was >0.5.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, quantum dot devices are subject to variability, and many measurements are required to characterise each device and find the conditions for qubit operation. Machine learning has been used to automate the tuning of devices from scratch, known as super coarse tuning [34][35][36] , the identification of single or double quantum dot regimes, known as coarse tuning 37,38 , and the tuning of the inter-dot tunnel couplings and other device parameters, referred to as fine tuning [39][40][41] .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here, we report on the performance of neural networks, which have been previously used to tune the electrostatics of devices 15 – 18 , to post-process single spin readout by spin-to-charge conversion. We compare their robustness and post-processing time to a Bayesian inference filter.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%