1986
DOI: 10.1001/archderm.122.8.919
|Get access via publisher |Summarize |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts

Autosomal recessive pachyonychia congenita

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
16
7
3
1

Citation Types

0
19
0
3

Year Published

1989
1989
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
23
1
1

Relationship

0
25

Authors

Journals

citations

Cited by 25 publications

(22 citation statements)
references

References 0 publications

0
19
0
3
Order By: Relevance
How this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…In five of these (families [16][17][18][19][20] mutations were at the intron 1/exon 2 boundary of K6a; three different sequence changes were identified, all of which we have reported previously, 16 but at that time, owing to the unavailability of mRNA, we were unable to identify the mutations at the protein level. However, in this study we obtained mRNA from a skin biopsy from an affected individual from family 17 with mutation K6a c.541-2A>G. The resulting cDNA was amplified by PCR and cloned, and several clones were sequenced to identify the consequence of this mutation.…”
Section: Mutation Analysis
mentioning
confidence: 66%
“…In all cases, the mutations were heterozygous sequence changesmissense, nonsense, small deletion/insertion or splice-site mutations -confirming this is predominantly, if not exclusively, an autosomal dominant disorder. While there are a few case reports of recessive PC reported in the literature, 19 as yet there are no recessive cases with confirmed genetic testing. The majority of the mutations identified have been previously reported with some mutations, for example K6a p.Asn172del, K16 p.Asn125Ser, K16 p.Arg127Cys and K17 p.Asn92Ser occurring frequently.…”
Section: Discussion
mentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
How this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…In five of these (families [16][17][18][19][20] mutations were at the intron 1/exon 2 boundary of K6a; three different sequence changes were identified, all of which we have reported previously, 16 but at that time, owing to the unavailability of mRNA, we were unable to identify the mutations at the protein level. However, in this study we obtained mRNA from a skin biopsy from an affected individual from family 17 with mutation K6a c.541-2A>G. The resulting cDNA was amplified by PCR and cloned, and several clones were sequenced to identify the consequence of this mutation.…”
Section: Mutation Analysis
mentioning
confidence: 66%
“…In all cases, the mutations were heterozygous sequence changesmissense, nonsense, small deletion/insertion or splice-site mutations -confirming this is predominantly, if not exclusively, an autosomal dominant disorder. While there are a few case reports of recessive PC reported in the literature, 19 as yet there are no recessive cases with confirmed genetic testing. The majority of the mutations identified have been previously reported with some mutations, for example K6a p.Asn172del, K16 p.Asn125Ser, K16 p.Arg127Cys and K17 p.Asn92Ser occurring frequently.…”
Section: Discussion
mentioning
confidence: 96%
How this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…Splice-site mutations were found in six families in KRT6A. In five of these (families [16][17][18][19][20] mutations were at the intron 1/exon 2 boundary of K6a; three different sequence changes were identified, all of which we have reported previously, 16 but at that time, owing to the unavailability of mRNA, we were unable to identify the mutations at the protein level. However, in this study we obtained mRNA from a skin biopsy from an affected individual from family 17 with mutation K6a c.541-2A>G. The resulting cDNA was amplified by PCR and cloned, and several clones were sequenced to identify the consequence of this mutation.…”
Section: Mutations In Krt6a (Pc-k6a)
mentioning
confidence: 69%
How this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…General clinical characteristics Among PC cases identified from the literature, IPCRR, or NRIRD, all but three cases in two unrelated families (Chong-Hai and Rajagopalan, 1977;Haber and Rose, 1986) are consistent with an autosomal dominant pattern of inheritance. One of these two reports bases the claim of recessive inheritance upon parental consanguinity plus the fact that no other family members exhibited the disease (Chong-Hai and Rajagopalan, 1977); however, it is more likely that this case represented a spontaneous dominant mutation rather than recessive inheritance.…”
Section: Results
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of these two reports bases the claim of recessive inheritance upon parental consanguinity plus the fact that no other family members exhibited the disease (Chong-Hai and Rajagopalan, 1977); however, it is more likely that this case represented a spontaneous dominant mutation rather than recessive inheritance. In the other possible recessive family, there were two affected offspring born to consanguineous parents (Haber and Rose, 1986); however, this could also be explained by one parent carrying a dominant mutation as a gonadal mosaic. In fact, the rate of spontaneous mutation appears to be relatively high, with 85 of 294 cases (29%) from the literature reporting a negative family history.…”
Section: Results
mentioning
confidence: 99%