2021
DOI: 10.3390/s21082709
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Autosegmentation of Prostate Zones and Cancer Regions from Biparametric Magnetic Resonance Images by Using Deep-Learning-Based Neural Networks

Abstract: The accuracy in diagnosing prostate cancer (PCa) has increased with the development of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI). Biparametric magnetic resonance imaging (bpMRI) was found to have a diagnostic accuracy comparable to mpMRI in detecting PCa. However, prostate MRI assessment relies on human experts and specialized training with considerable inter-reader variability. Deep learning may be a more robust approach for prostate MRI assessment. Here we present a method for autosegmenting the pro… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Interestingly, recent studies presenting DL algorithms for automated MRI tumor segmentations of other pelvic malignancies report performance metrics with DSCs in the range of 0.52-0.84 [35][36][37][38][39], i.e., prostate cancer (DSC of 0.52 using k-fold cross-validation [35] [n = 204]), endometrial cancer (DSC of 0.77/0.84 using a test set [36] [n = 139] and DSC of 0.81 using k-fold cross-validation [37] [n = 200]), and rectal cancer (DSC of 0.68/0.70 using a test set [38] [n = 140] and DSC of 0.70 using a test set [39] [n = 300]). Hence, our DSCs for the DL algorithm in CC (DL-R1: median DSC = 0.60, DL-R2: DSC = 0.58) are quite comparable to that of other pelvic malignancies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interestingly, recent studies presenting DL algorithms for automated MRI tumor segmentations of other pelvic malignancies report performance metrics with DSCs in the range of 0.52-0.84 [35][36][37][38][39], i.e., prostate cancer (DSC of 0.52 using k-fold cross-validation [35] [n = 204]), endometrial cancer (DSC of 0.77/0.84 using a test set [36] [n = 139] and DSC of 0.81 using k-fold cross-validation [37] [n = 200]), and rectal cancer (DSC of 0.68/0.70 using a test set [38] [n = 140] and DSC of 0.70 using a test set [39] [n = 300]). Hence, our DSCs for the DL algorithm in CC (DL-R1: median DSC = 0.60, DL-R2: DSC = 0.58) are quite comparable to that of other pelvic malignancies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some researchers proposed the combination of T2WI and DWI to balance the limited spatial resolution of DWI [ 12 , 33 , 34 ]. The combination of T2WI+DWI+ADC exhibited the best performance [ 35 ].Using an ADC map alone, the estimated volume of the HCTV ADC in the present study was less satisfactory. The HCTV ADC underestimated the volume of tumors, which could lead to omission of lesions and thus deteriorate treatment outcome.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The absence of an external testing dataset is a critical limitation to the clinical applicability of the developed models. Data augmentation and transfer learning were also used to help addressing this issue [ 6 , 14 16 , 29 , 31 , 33 , 35 – 41 , 43 , 51 ]. It is important to note that some bias cannot be balanced-out by increasing the sample size by data augmentation or repetition of training.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%