1999
DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1099-1115(199906)13:4<203::aid-acs544>3.0.co;2-t
|Get access via publisher |Summarize |Cite
Automatic steering of ships using neural networks
Abstract: SUMMARYShip steering control system design presents challenges because the dynamic properties of the vessel itself vary signi"cantly. The use of an arti"cial neural network as a controller which incorporates the properties of a series of conventional controllers designed for di!erent operating conditions could provide an alternative to adaptive control or gain scheduling in this application. Local model network methods could also provide a basis for e$cient modelling of the vessel over a range of operating con…
Search citation statements
Paper Sections
Select...
63
8
0
0
Citation Types
0
19
0
0
Year Published
2000
2024
Publication Types
Select...
46
19
5
Relationship
0
70
Authors
Journals
Cited by 70 publications
(19 citation statements)
References 26 publications
0
19
0
0
“…Conventional control strategies like PID control can no longer satisfy the requirement of navigation, guidance and control of ships. During recent decades, many advanced control schemes have been developed and successfully applied to ship motion control, including sliding mode variable structure control [2,3]; parameter adaptive control [4,5]; H-infinity robust control [6,7]; neural-network control [8,9]; fuzzy control [10,11]; neuro-fuzzy control [12,13]; line-of-sight based model control [14,15], etc.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…Conventional control strategies like PID control can no longer satisfy the requirement of navigation, guidance and control of ships. During recent decades, many advanced control schemes have been developed and successfully applied to ship motion control, including sliding mode variable structure control [2,3]; parameter adaptive control [4,5]; H-infinity robust control [6,7]; neural-network control [8,9]; fuzzy control [10,11]; neuro-fuzzy control [12,13]; line-of-sight based model control [14,15], etc.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…2. The system parameters for the ships are T 1 = 21, K 1 = 0.23, α 1 = 0.3 used in [34], T 2 = 31, K 2 = 0.5, α 2 = 0.4 used in [35], T 3 = −1252.3, K 3 = 0.084, α 3 = 1, and T 4 = −249.9, K 4 = 0.0119, α 4 = 1 used in [36]. The Nussbaum gains used for the ships are N(k 26) is σ = Ï€/300.…”
Section: B Multiple-ship Tracking Control Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…, r N ), r i > 0, for 1 ≤ i ≤ N, such that RH+H T R ≥ λ 0 I. Thus, the first term in (35) can be expressed as…”
Section: Appendix B Proof Of Lemmamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…• Path Following: Without dependency on prior knowledge of dynamic modeling, DNN [166]- [170] and DRL [14], [19], [175] are able to generate the control signal directly. DRL can learn from the interactions between the agent and environment to find the best policy without knowing any information in advance.…”
Section: B Control Withmentioning
confidence: 99%
