2016 International Conference on Communication and Signal Processing (ICCSP) 2016
DOI: 10.1109/iccsp.2016.7754252
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Automatic logo detection and extraction using singular value decomposition

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Veershetty et al [44] eliminate noise and symbols using a morpho-logical operation, and extract each logo from the document using the CC rule. Dixit et al [13] find CCs and perform area-based thresholding to get pool of possible logo candidates. This method is based on the assumption that logo region has a higher spatial density than non-logo region, which is not always true.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Veershetty et al [44] eliminate noise and symbols using a morpho-logical operation, and extract each logo from the document using the CC rule. Dixit et al [13] find CCs and perform area-based thresholding to get pool of possible logo candidates. This method is based on the assumption that logo region has a higher spatial density than non-logo region, which is not always true.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The couple of texture features having the largest Fisher score are: « Mean » and « Hölder exponent », they are selected as the most discriminative for our case. The multifractal texture feature (Hölder exponent) α is defined by the following equation (13).…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to the obtained results, we can affirm that the proposed approach is more effective than many other state-of-the-art logo detection methods. [5] Tobacco-800 1151 91.47 98.10 Li et al [15] Tobacco-800 1290 86.50 99.40 Pham et al [16] Tobacco-800 426 90.05 92.98 Dixit and Shirdhonkar [17] Tobacco-800 1290 89.52 -Jain and Doermann [18] Tobacco-800 435 -87.00 Le et al [19] Tobacco-800 1290 88.78 91.15 Kumar and Ranjith [20] Tobacco-800 500 91.30 -Wiggers et al [21] Tobacco-800 1290 -72 Alaei et al [22] Tobacco-800 1290 91.50 75.25 Proposed approach Tobacco-800 1290 96.86 98.93…”
Section: Experimental Studymentioning
confidence: 99%