2017
DOI: 10.1109/tgrs.2017.2702200
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Automatic Ice Surface and Bottom Boundaries Estimation in Radar Imagery Based on Level-Set Approach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Another critical area of innovation in radioglaciological data processing and analysis is automatic methods for radargram image interpretation. These include algorithms for layer tracking, bed and surface mapping and basal feature categorization (Sime and others, 2011; Crandall and others, 2012; Ferro and Bruzzone, 2012; Ilisei and Bruzzone, 2015; Panton and Karlsson, 2015; Carrer and Bruzzone, 2016; Rahnemoonfar and others, 2017; Berger and others, 2018; Donini and others, 2019). Success of these approaches is a prerequisite to be able to cope efficiently with the data volume of future surveys and effectively exploit their information content.…”
Section: Processingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another critical area of innovation in radioglaciological data processing and analysis is automatic methods for radargram image interpretation. These include algorithms for layer tracking, bed and surface mapping and basal feature categorization (Sime and others, 2011; Crandall and others, 2012; Ferro and Bruzzone, 2012; Ilisei and Bruzzone, 2015; Panton and Karlsson, 2015; Carrer and Bruzzone, 2016; Rahnemoonfar and others, 2017; Berger and others, 2018; Donini and others, 2019). Success of these approaches is a prerequisite to be able to cope efficiently with the data volume of future surveys and effectively exploit their information content.…”
Section: Processingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Newer work in this field utilizes image processing, computer vision, and deep learning techniques to automatically or semi-automatically determine ice surface and bottom boundaries from echograms [1][2][3][4][5][6][7]. Gifford et al [1] employs both the edge-based and active contour methodologies to automate the task of locating polar ice and bedrock layers from airborne radar data acquired over Greenland and Antarctica.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mitchell et al [2] uses a level-set technique for estimating bedrock and surface layers, but find it problematic because of the need to reinitialize the curve manually for each radar image. Therefore, Rahnemoonfar et al [3] introduces the distance regularization term, which essentially maintains the regularity of the level-set and leads to a stable numerical procedure without the need for reinitialization. Recently, Rahnemoonfar et al [4] proposes a novel approach that automatically detects the complex topology of the ice surface and bottom boundaries based on the charged particle concept.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several semi-automated and automated methods exist for layer finding and estimating ice thickness in radar images [1][2][3][4][5][6]. Crandall et al [1] used probabilistic graphical models for detecting the ice layer boundary in echogram images from Greenland and Antarctica.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, for every single image, the user needs to re-initialize the curve manually and as a result, the method is quite slow and was applied only to a small dataset. This problem was fixed in [4,5], where authors introduced a distance regularization term in the level set approach to maintain the regularity of level set intrinsically. Therefore, it does not need any manual re-initialization and was automatically applied to a large dataset.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%